From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 14:45:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002214551.GC3006@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001171349.81454-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:13:49AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> __fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
> rcu_read_lock() and doesn't directly synchronize with
> fsverity_remove_info().
>
> For the same inode this isn't a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
> only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
> inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
> accessed via that inode.
>
> However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
> __fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes. Those rely on following
> fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
> They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.
>
> Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of 'struct fsverity_info' after
> it's been removed from the rhashtable.
>
> Fixes: f77f281b6118 ("fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/verity/fsverity_private.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> fs/verity/open.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/linux.git/log/?h=for-current
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 17:13 [PATCH] fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info Eric Biggers
2026-10-01 21:23 ` Sandeep Dhavale
2026-10-02 21:45 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-10-05 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002214551.GC3006@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.