From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: omap: wait for !BUSY before reading time for the power-off alarm
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:07:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004220732.BDE7D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004215914.397512-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
> omap_rtc_power_off_program() reads the time registers to arm ALARM2
> one second ahead, but does not wait for STATUS.BUSY to clear first,
> unlike omap_rtc_read_time(). The time registers must not be accessed
> while BUSY is set, as the counters may be partway through an update.
>
> A read during an update can return, for example, seconds already
> wrapped to 0 with minutes still at the old value. The rollover check
> after arming only compares the seconds register, which no longer
> changes, so it passes and ALARM2 is armed for a time that has already
> passed. Power-off or rtc-only suspend then waits for an alarm that
> does not fire as intended.
>
> Call rtc_wait_not_busy() before the read, as omap_rtc_read_time()
> does. Both callers run with local interrupts disabled, as the access
> window requires.
>
> Fixes: 222a12fca604 ("rtc: omap: add support for pmic_power_en")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004215914.397512-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 21:59 [PATCH] rtc: omap: wait for !BUSY before reading time for the power-off alarm Rosen Penev
2026-10-04 22:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261004220732.BDE7D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.