All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Daehyeon Ko" <4ncienth@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] vhost/vsock: size receive SKBs from declared payload
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 23:56:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004235619.C64811F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004235101.1464007-1-4ncienth@gmail.com>

> vhost_vsock_alloc_skb() sizes the skb from iov_length(), the total guest
> descriptor length.  virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt() instead adds hdr->len to
> rx_bytes and buf_used, and budgets each queued skb as SKB_TRUESIZE(0).  The
> guest controls the descriptor length and hdr->len independently.
> 
> A guest can therefore provide a 64 KiB descriptor while declaring a zero
> payload.  The descriptor-sized skb remains queued, rx_bytes and buf_used
> remain unchanged, and only the fixed queue-entry budget limits retention.
> This is not a lifetime leak: the skb is freed when dequeued or at socket
> teardown.  Repeating this across connections can nevertheless exhaust host
> memory.  On Linux v7.2, 455 such descriptors retained 30,255,680 bytes for
> a 262,144-byte receive buffer; a full-payload control retained 265,984
> bytes.
> 
> Vhost previously read hdr->len and allocated pkt->buf from that value.  The
> conversion from virtio_vsock_pkt to sk_buff instead allocated receive skbs
> from the descriptor length, introducing the allocation-accounting mismatch.
> 
> Copy the header into a stack object and validate hdr->len before allocating
> the skb.  Size the allocation as sizeof(hdr) + payload_len so descriptor
> capacity no longer determines queued memory.  Check payload_len against
> len - sizeof(hdr) to avoid addition overflow on 32-bit hosts.
> 
> Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004235101.1464007-1-4ncienth@gmail.com?part=1


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-04 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 23:51 [PATCH net v3] vhost/vsock: size receive SKBs from declared payload Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-04 23:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261004235619.C64811F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.