From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E566D547073 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 00:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791161893; cv=none; b=qM/Qspbe15SE/N7BT6+sXitEQGj4anyDT2/ojyhVnalnaJJ+przuI+FvDPwH7OwhJE3ExZc08fjfPCEaapsSeigqHKy9U2QHHxD2Gd6xoqNJjpmk0EIMbe96xtKg5d74ctEr1M74L8epkFmIfVSD5Ke3W3QXpQDuaFXjZsEkh5k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791161893; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JeYbh+Qd0C5dLl3iJdr0/zzU0QiphK5t+eNB5TL/V+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=H9KjLKtCuZUndCX0PAx9oIx3emDX3ya7t0qrHFSXyqEek/c+NgZEaGaHTbJEG/eOv0Yi3xCixqNJqI0l0wmqWY+kUZd90/k7JVLDBTl6FxgLAu6OkpVRSXHDTK/phGcNxds7QDExdK2lShAFOZJ0T1I5qDATy94VhMafK6IBNzk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Q3SrPczb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Q3SrPczb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791161892; x=1822697892; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=JeYbh+Qd0C5dLl3iJdr0/zzU0QiphK5t+eNB5TL/V+Q=; b=Q3SrPczbunASnRimiNUM8mcYuGSTJ8clsr8r3vUtmfT4EoWxwK62SsD2 c3wT8fZo5Xto1UsezNaKgUmn9PTyy8dDZYNPbid9WwfYv1g4TLacRoIDO 9wv2taCFpanP3vRq/F2YQndd0P45n/Y/CZZ+IduGp/Knp4UJE1C4iLF7k ec4qPLK3CeUgNGbppXS8jvk3NGTqYgUTFfNGk5zgVRjHqLKJUdq/QrlpL JEi5Vl0y58gC4obcMWqVwWnN5as48DmoSGjX1D1nDZtY37jUPcvIqOhUq yLIjqodXofzmVA/l2/UaD+0U3nA3oarlQ7fow0yzn9OXU2Id59lrFWF1U A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XNaPGCYoTQWjRZPOYAQ00g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dpWkZ0V3SRq9SxLdraR1MA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11925"; a="108208512" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,141,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="108208512" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2026 17:58:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LTGX4+IsRGOLbDmXJGMx+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: goImnDXrQgK5egEFBJ2+cA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,141,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="306199467" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 3a02ec7efc9f) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2026 17:58:10 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3a02ec7efc9f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xDX1r-000000000VH-3Iha; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:58:07 +0000 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:57:10 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Brauner Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Christian Brauner Subject: [brauner-vfs:vfs.all 356/378] fs/nullfs.c:55:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'nullfs_nolease'; did you mean 'nullfs_nolock'? Message-ID: <202610050233.4otV9Kjb-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all head: 4852668f27dd07a38b753c3ad673ffb0bc3c00ec commit: 580de1b24ab7a3e0cb73db6c341bf40d7f683797 [356/378] nullfs: add an empty immutable regular file config: i386-randconfig-r2307-20261004 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261005/202610050233.4otV9Kjb-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ca7933e47d3a3451d81e72ac174dcb5aa28b59d1) sparse: v0.6.5-rc1 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261005/202610050233.4otV9Kjb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202610050233.4otV9Kjb-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/nullfs.c:55:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'nullfs_nolease'; did you mean 'nullfs_nolock'? 55 | .setlease = nullfs_nolease, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | nullfs_nolock fs/nullfs.c:26:12: note: 'nullfs_nolock' declared here 26 | static int nullfs_nolock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl) | ^ >> fs/nullfs.c:55:14: error: incompatible function pointer types initializing 'int (*)(struct file *, int, struct file_lease **, void **)' with an expression of type 'int (struct file *, int, struct file_lock *)' [-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types] 55 | .setlease = nullfs_nolease, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 errors generated. vim +55 fs/nullfs.c 47 48 /* an empty regular file, with the same refusals as the directory */ 49 static const struct file_operations nullfs_file_operations = { 50 .llseek = generic_file_llseek, 51 .read_iter = nullfs_file_read_iter, 52 .fsync = noop_fsync, 53 .lock = nullfs_nolock, 54 .flock = nullfs_nolock, > 55 .setlease = nullfs_nolease, 56 }; 57 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki