All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
	"KBuild Mailing List" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
	"Wilson Felipe Pereira" <wfelipe@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 15:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005131417.GA1097851@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005060713.afde74805e607478d6bda2ea@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 06:07:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2026 12:31:18 +0200 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   init/Kconfig
> > 
> > between commits:
> > 
> >   d514d23689356 ("init/Kconfig: make config INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT user-configurable")
> >   9998f5eea1407 ("init, arch: make CONFIG_COMMAND_LINE_SIZE globally configurable")
> > 
> > from the mm-nonmm-unstable tree and commit:
> > 
> >   f85147b291e35 ("kbuild: move the toolchain checks into scripts/Kconfig.toolchain")
> > 
> > from the kbuild tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > diff --combined init/Kconfig
> > index 914c4c3ed7ee4,352601b44b5ca..0000000000000
> > ...
> > [250+ lines of diff]
> >
> 
> yikes.  I think I'll disable Wilson's command-line patches until after
> kbuild has merged up.
> 
> After kbuild is upstream I'll take a look at resurrecting command-line
> patches for a late merge-window thing or I'll bump them into 7.4-rcX. 
> Probably the former.
> 
> kbuilders: please try to merge early!

I plan to submit my pull request for 7.4 between 7.3-rc7 and 7.3 final.

That said, I fail to see where the conflict comes from between these
changes. They don't touch the same area in init/Kconfig. If I pull
mm-nonmm-unstable into kbuild-for-next, I don't get a conflict in
init/Kconfig at all, I only get the one in scripts/kallsyms.c that was
mentioned in another thread. Is something else going on here?

-- 
Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-05 10:31 linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree Mark Brown
2026-10-05 13:07 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-05 13:14   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-10-05 13:19     ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-30 11:47 Mark Brown
2026-09-30 12:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261005131417.GA1097851@ax162 \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=wfelipe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.