From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,tjmercier@google.com,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,muchun.song@linux.dev,mhocko@suse.com,ljs@kernel.org,kasong@tencent.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,david@kernel.org,baohua@kernel.org,axelrasmussen@google.com,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_shrink_node.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 17:50:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007005017.93A3C1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: memcg: remove mem_cgroup_shrink_node()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_shrink_node.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Subject: memcg: remove mem_cgroup_shrink_node()
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 10:43:05 -0700
Its only caller was soft limit reclaim, which is gone.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260902174311.1772372-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
---
mm/internal.h | 4 ----
mm/vmscan.c | 41 -----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 45 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/internal.h~memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_shrink_node
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -78,10 +78,6 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
gfp_t gfp_mask,
unsigned int reclaim_options,
int *swappiness);
-unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
- pg_data_t *pgdat,
- unsigned long *nr_scanned);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio;
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_shrink_node
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -6805,47 +6805,6 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
-/* Only used by soft limit reclaim. Do not reuse for anything else. */
-unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
- pg_data_t *pgdat,
- unsigned long *nr_scanned)
-{
- struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
- struct scan_control sc = {
- .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
- .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
- .may_writepage = 1,
- .may_unmap = 1,
- .reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
- .may_swap = !noswap,
- };
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!current->reclaim_state);
-
- sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
- (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
-
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin(sc.gfp_mask,
- sc.order,
- memcg);
-
- /*
- * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
- * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
- * if we don't reclaim here, the shrink_node from balance_pgdat
- * will pick up pages from other mem cgroup's as well. We hack
- * the priority and make it zero.
- */
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, &sc);
-
- trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed, memcg);
-
- *nr_scanned = sc.nr_scanned;
-
- return sc.nr_reclaimed;
-}
-
unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long nr_pages,
gfp_t gfp_mask,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from shakeel.butt@linux.dev are
memcg-move-per-node-objcg-to-the-read-mostly-fields.patch
memcg-split-mem_cgroup_private_id-into-two-fields.patch
memcg-group-the-write-hot-fields-of-struct-mem_cgroup.patch
memcg-group-the-cold-fields-of-struct-mem_cgroup.patch
memcg-group-the-read-mostly-fields-of-struct-mem_cgroup.patch
memcg-group-the-fields-of-struct-mem_cgroup_per_node.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007005017.93A3C1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.