All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/23] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 00:51:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008075136.3008537-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008074959.2993751-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Each field of a .bpf_cleanup record is a byte offset into a code
section: a 32-bit relocation against that section's symbol, with the
offset as the implicit addend. The linker refuses it: it does not know
LLVM's R_BPF_64_NODYLD32, and from a non-executable section it takes a
relocation against a section symbol only as a 64-bit pointer to code.

Take it in both spellings, R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 from LLVM and
R_BPF_64_ABS32 from GNU as, adding the code section's new start to the
stored byte offset. Since any non-executable section can now reach that
path, it checks itself what the old refusal covered: that the target has
data, and that r_offset is aligned and in bounds.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index f3f71c452f00..c607f51e3cb4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,8 @@ static int linker_sanity_check_elf_relos(struct src_obj *obj, struct src_sec *se
 		size_t sym_type = ELF64_R_TYPE(relo->r_info);
 
 		if (sym_type != R_BPF_64_64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_32 &&
-		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32) {
+		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32 &&
+		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_NODYLD32) {
 			pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu has unexpected type %zu in %s\n",
 				i, sec->sec_idx, sym_type, obj->filename);
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -2263,6 +2264,7 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
 			if (ELF64_ST_TYPE(src_sym->st_info) == STT_SECTION) {
 				struct src_sec *sec = &obj->secs[src_sym->st_shndx];
 				struct bpf_insn *insn;
+				__u32 *val;
 
 				if (src_linked_sec->shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR) {
 					/* calls to the very first static function inside
@@ -2297,6 +2299,39 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
 					if (linker->swapped_endian)
 						off = bswap_64(off);
 					memcpy(ptr, &off, sizeof(off));
+				} else if ((sym_type == R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 ||
+					    sym_type == R_BPF_64_ABS32) &&
+					   (sec->shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR)) {
+					/*
+					 * A byte offset into a code section,
+					 * stored in place. LLVM spells this
+					 * relocation NODYLD32 and GNU as
+					 * spells it ABS32; being bytes, the
+					 * section's new start goes in as it
+					 * is, not scaled the way a call's
+					 * instruction index is above.
+					 *
+					 * r_offset is checked only for an
+					 * executable section, and SHT_NOBITS
+					 * has no raw_data, so bound it here --
+					 * subtracting, so it cannot wrap.
+					 */
+					if (!dst_linked_sec->raw_data ||
+					    dst_linked_sec->sec_sz < (int)sizeof(*val) ||
+					    dst_rel->r_offset % sizeof(*val) ||
+					    dst_rel->r_offset >
+					    (size_t)dst_linked_sec->sec_sz - sizeof(*val)) {
+						pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu points outside the data of section '%s' in %s\n",
+							j, src_sec->sec_idx,
+							dst_linked_sec->sec_name,
+							obj->filename);
+						return -EINVAL;
+					}
+					val = dst_linked_sec->raw_data + dst_rel->r_offset;
+					if (linker->swapped_endian)
+						*val = bswap_32(bswap_32(*val) + sec->dst_off);
+					else
+						*val += sec->dst_off;
 				} else {
 					pr_warn("relocation against STT_SECTION in non-exec section is not supported!\n");
 					return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  7:49 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/23] bpf: Pack bpf_insn_aux_data flags into bit fields Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/23] bpf: Accept the compiler's exception cleanup table at program load Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] bpf: Add the bpf_unwind() and bpf_unwind_resume() kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/23] bpf: Keep a call site's landing pad in insn_aux_data, add lookups Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 15:58     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/23] bpf: Mark covered call sites and check a program can take a table Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/23] bpf: Make exception landing pads reachable in the CFG Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/23] bpf: Verify an unwind through landing pads and epilogues Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/23] bpf: Refuse a landing pad that does not resume Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:11     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/23] bpf: Do not use a private stack for a program that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/23] bpf: Prepare JITed programs for dispatching cleanup pads Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/23] bpf: Dispatch cleanup pads by rewriting return addresses Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/23] bpf: Refuse a trampoline that calls a subprog that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:19     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/23] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/23] bpf, arm64: " Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:23     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/23] libbpf: Resolve the compiler's _Unwind_Resume to the kernel's kfunc Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/23] libbpf: Add cleanup_info to bpf_prog_load_opts Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  8:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:25     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/23] libbpf: Collect .bpf_cleanup records and pass them to the kernel Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/23] libbpf: Carry the exception cleanup table through the light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-10-08  8:14   ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/23] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:26     ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add end-to-end and negative .bpf_cleanup exception tests Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] selftests/bpf: Add __set_global() and __ret_global() test tags Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] selftests/bpf: Cover more accepted .bpf_cleanup exception shapes Yonghong Song
2026-10-08  7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/23] selftests/bpf: Load an exception cleanup program from a light skeleton Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008075136.3008537-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.