From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] s390/appldata: Emulate virtual timer with delayed work
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 19:08:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008190827.1b9762c0@thinkpad-T15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006140113.3128582-2-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:01:12 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Emulate the virtual timer in appldata using delayed work: the work is
> scheduled for the minimum possible wall-clock time until the
> configured CPU-time interval elapses (remaining CPU time / number of
> online CPUs), with a minimum delay of 100ms. The work then reads
> per-CPU statistics of all online CPUs to check whether enough CPU time
> has elapsed, and if so runs the registered callbacks.
>
> This is slightly more expensive, but allows to subsequently remove the
> entire vtimer infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Nice improvement, with minimum wall-clock interval 100ms. Specifying a 1ms
CPU-time interval was possible, but did not make much sense in practice.
On very idle systems, the resulting wall-clock interval would also have
been around 100ms, but as soon as they do some work, it would have become
far too frequent.
Also tested it, and on a busy system there is now no noticeable difference
for interval values 1-100, while idle systems still behave like before.
Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 14:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] s390: Remove vtimer infrastructure Heiko Carstens
2026-10-06 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] s390/appldata: Emulate virtual timer with delayed work Heiko Carstens
2026-10-06 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 17:08 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2026-10-08 17:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-10-06 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/vtime: Remove vtimer infrastructure Heiko Carstens
2026-10-06 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008190827.1b9762c0@thinkpad-T15 \
--to=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.