From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, aethernet65535@gmail.com,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: Use only installed probe in damon_merge_two_regions()
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 00:43:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009074349.40812-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008151944.113714-2-suhaas@s-joshi.in>
Hello Suhaas,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 20:49:25 +0530 Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in> wrote:
> While merging 2 regions, we iterate over the entire probe_hits[] array,
> whose size is determined by the DAMON_MAX_PROBES macro. However, it is
> possible that we have fewer probes installed than DAMON_MAX_PROBES. In such
> cases, we end up making redundant iterations. Therefore, to remedy this,
> iterate over the list of installed probes instead of iterating over the
> entire array. For doing this, start accepting a struct damon_ctx in
> damon_merge_two_regions(), and update calling functions to pass this
> argument.
>
> Update the damon_test_merge_two() test to use this new signature for
> damon_merge_two_regions() as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in>
> ---
> mm/damon/core.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index b63e60ef8990..fc202f90991b 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -3524,20 +3524,26 @@ static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(
> /*
> * Merge two adjacent regions into one region
> */
> -static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_target *t,
> - struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r)
> +static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> + struct damon_target *t,
> + struct damon_region *l,
> + struct damon_region *r)
Please use two tabs for indentation of the second and next lines of function
parameters. For example:
'''
@@ -3739,8 +3739,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_DEBUG_SANITY
-static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(
- struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r)
+static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
+ struct damon_target *t, struct damon_region *l,
+ struct damon_region *r)
{
/* damon_merge_two_regions() may created incorrect left region */
WARN_ONCE(l->ar.start >= l->ar.end, "l: %lu-%lu, r: %lu-%lu\n",
'''
> {
> unsigned long sz_l = damon_sz_region(l), sz_r = damon_sz_region(r);
> int i;
> + struct damon_probe *p;
>
> l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) /
> (sz_l + sz_r);
> l->age = (l->age * sz_l + r->age * sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r);
> l->ar.end = r->ar.end;
> - /* todo: do this for only installed probes */
> - for (i = 0; i < DAMON_MAX_PROBES; i++)
> +
> + i = 0;
> + damon_for_each_probe(p, ctx) {
> l->probe_hits[i] = (l->probe_hits[i] * sz_l + r->probe_hits[i]
> * sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r);
> + ++i;
> + }
> damon_verify_merge_two_regions(l, r);
> damon_destroy_region(r, t);
> }
> @@ -3590,7 +3596,7 @@ static void damon_merge_regions_of(struct damon_target *t, unsigned int thres,
> goto set_prev_continue;
> if (damon_sz_region(prev) + damon_sz_region(r) > sz_limit)
> goto set_prev_continue;
> - damon_merge_two_regions(t, prev, r);
> + damon_merge_two_regions(ctx, t, prev, r);
> continue;
> set_prev_continue:
> prev = r;
> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index ef146ca2ae8a..4e380c6c5eb2 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -182,13 +182,27 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct damon_target *t;
> struct damon_region *r, *r2, *r3;
> + struct damon_probe *p;
> + struct damon_ctx *ctx;
> int i;
>
> + p = damon_new_probe();
> + if (!p)
> + kunit_skip(test, "probe alloc fail");
> + ctx = damon_new_ctx();
> + if (!ctx) {
> + damon_destroy_probe(p);
> + kunit_skip(test, "context alloc fail");
> + }
> + damon_add_probe(ctx, p);
> t = damon_new_target();
> - if (!t)
> + if (!t) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail");
> + }
> r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
> if (!r) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail");
> }
> @@ -198,6 +212,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> damon_add_region(r, t);
> r2 = damon_new_region(100, 300);
> if (!r2) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> kunit_skip(test, "second region alloc fail");
> }
> @@ -206,7 +221,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> r2->age = 21;
> damon_add_region(r2, t);
Let's allocate and setup 'ctx' and 'p' here. That will reduce alloc failure
handling code. Also add 't' to 'ctx'. That will let us to remove
damon_free_target() call from the final cleanup.
>
> - damon_merge_two_regions(t, r, r2);
> + damon_merge_two_regions(ctx, t, r, r2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 300ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 16u);
> @@ -220,6 +235,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> }
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
>
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> }
>
> --
> 2.55.0
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261008151944.113714-1-suhaas@s-joshi.in>
2026-10-08 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: Use only installed probe in damon_merge_two_regions() Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-08 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 15:33 ` Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-09 7:46 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 7:43 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-10-08 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/core: Copy only installed probe in damon_split_region_at() Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-08 15:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 2:40 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-09 8:21 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 15:43 ` Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-09 4:06 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009074349.40812-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=suhaas@s-joshi.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.