All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Ben Horgan" <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	"Ștefania Ion" <stefion@google.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Pankaj Patil" <pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/23] arm64: cpufeature: Add read_cpuid_with_overrides()
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 11:07:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009100738.31288-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009100738.31288-1-will@kernel.org>

From: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>

__cpuinfo_store_cpu() stores the ID registers raw. Its gates on reading
a feature's register test those raw values. The exception is
gmid_el1_accessible(), which open-codes MTE's command-line override. It
checks the override with arm64_ftr_safe_value(), since
init_cpu_features() hasn't yet removed an unsafe one. The other gates
still read a feature's register when the command line disabled it. That's
the read that trapped on GMID_EL1.

Add read_cpuid_with_overrides(), which applies every valid override to
any register in arm64_ftr_regs[]. An override is valid when
arm64_ftr_safe_value() returns it unchanged. validate_ftr_regs() has
checked the table by the first store, so the lookup is safe there.
arm64_apply_feature_override() can't do this: it takes one field and no
descriptor to check the override against.

Store ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 through it, and replace gmid_el1_accessible()
with a test on the stored value at its three callers, as for SME.

Other readers of the stored value see the override too. With
arm64.nosme, __cpuinfo_store_cpu() no longer reads SMIDR_EL1. CPUs that
differ only in an ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 field the command line turned off no
longer taint the kernel. init_cpu_ftr_reg() logs a valid override as
"already set" rather than "forced".

The helper is Suzuki's override_cpu_ftr_reg(), without its other two
call sites.

Co-developed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/afc5bd00-28ca-413b-b047-ee53589c285d@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 11 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c         |  4 +-
 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
index f332fbd8e46d..6d2a5ac4c2f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -79,6 +79,5 @@ void __init validate_ftr_regs(void);
 void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
 void update_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
 				 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot);
-bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
 
 #endif /* __ASM_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 4f04ad82ea34..5a4d25325856 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -627,6 +627,13 @@ static inline bool id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(u64 pfr1)
 	return val > 0;
 }
 
+static inline bool id_aa64pfr1_mte(u64 pfr1)
+{
+	u32 val = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+	return val >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
+}
+
 void __init setup_boot_cpu_features(void);
 void __init setup_system_features(void);
 void __init setup_user_features(void);
@@ -957,6 +964,10 @@ static inline unsigned int get_vmid_bits(u64 mmfr1)
 
 s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur);
 struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id);
+u64 arm64_ftr_reg_override(u32 sys_id, u64 val);
+
+/* Read this CPU's ID register with each valid command-line override applied. */
+#define read_cpuid_with_overrides(reg)	arm64_ftr_reg_override(SYS_##reg, read_cpuid(reg))
 
 extern struct arm64_ftr_override id_aa64mmfr0_override;
 extern struct arm64_ftr_override id_aa64mmfr1_override;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 727e1665c987..3161531ad401 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -962,6 +962,32 @@ s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+u64 arm64_ftr_reg_override(u32 sys_id, u64 val)
+{
+	struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id);
+	const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
+
+	if (!reg || !reg->override->mask)
+		return val;
+
+	for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
+		u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
+		s64 ftr_new, ftr_ovr;
+
+		if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->mask) != ftr_mask)
+			continue;
+
+		ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, val);
+		ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->override->val);
+
+		/* An unsafe override is left for init_cpu_ftr_reg() to remove. */
+		if (arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new) == ftr_ovr)
+			val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_ovr);
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
 void __init validate_ftr_regs(void)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -1178,33 +1204,6 @@ static bool detect_ftr_has_mpam(void)
 	return id_aa64pfr0_mpam(pfr0) || id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(pfr1);
 }
 
-bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
-{
-	const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
-	s64 mte, ovr;
-	u64 ftr_mask;
-
-	/* No ID register reflects CONFIG_ARM64_MTE. */
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE))
-		return false;
-
-	for (ftrp = ftr_id_aa64pfr1; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
-		if (ftrp->shift == ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_SHIFT)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
-	mte = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, info->reg_id_aa64pfr1);
-
-	/* The boot CPU runs before init_cpu_ftr_reg() strips unsafe overrides. */
-	if ((id_aa64pfr1_override.mask & ftr_mask) == ftr_mask) {
-		ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, id_aa64pfr1_override.val);
-		mte = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ovr, mte);
-	}
-
-	return mte >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
-}
-
 void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 {
 	init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, info->reg_ctr);
@@ -1254,7 +1253,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1, info->reg_mpamidr);
 	}
 
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_GMID_EL1, info->reg_gmid);
 }
 
@@ -1516,7 +1515,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	 * they read/write depends on the GMID_EL1.BS field. Check that the
 	 * value is the same on all CPUs.
 	 */
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_GMID_EL1, cpu,
 					      info->reg_gmid, boot->reg_gmid);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 45c63f3d75c5..d48167fe4218 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -496,13 +496,13 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 	info->reg_id_aa64mmfr3 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64mmfr4 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64pfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
-	info->reg_id_aa64pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
+	info->reg_id_aa64pfr1 = read_cpuid_with_overrides(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64pfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64zfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64smfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64fpfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64FPFR0_EL1);
 
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		info->reg_gmid = read_cpuid(GMID_EL1);
 
 	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
-- 
2.56.0.385.gd3acb90ef8-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 10:07 [PATCH v2 00/23] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:46   ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-09 11:07     ` Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] arm64: cpufeature: Check arm64_ftr_regs[] before the first store Will Deacon
2026-10-10  2:49   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-09 10:07 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] arm64: cpufeature: Read MPAMIDR_EL1 in __cpuinfo_store_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 15:44   ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] arm64: cpufeature: Store every ID register with its overrides applied Will Deacon
2026-10-09 15:51   ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-11  7:34     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-12 11:10       ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon
2026-10-11  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Michael Kelley
2026-10-12 13:35 ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009100738.31288-7-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=stefion@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.