From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bui Viet Dung <dungvn2345@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: sch_netem: prevent packet length underflow with negative overhead
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 17:03:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261010170341.251cf390@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008035656.330667-1-dungvn2345@gmail.com>
On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 10:56:56 +0700
Bui Viet Dung <dungvn2345@gmail.com> wrote:
> packet_time_ns() calculates transmission time for netem rate shaping.
> It adds q->packet_overhead (signed 32-bit int) to len (unsigned
> 64-bit int).
>
> When userspace configures a negative packet overhead (via
> TCA_NETEM_RATE packet_overhead attribute) and an enqueued packet's
> length is smaller than the absolute overhead, (s64)len +
> q->packet_overhead is negative. Because len is u64, the addition wraps
> into an astronomical value (~2^64 - 1). When multiplied by NSEC_PER_SEC
> and divided by q->rate, the calculated delay spans hours or days,
> causing enqueued packets to be frozen in the qdisc indefinitely and
> stalling transmission.
>
> A similar underflow can occur in cell length calculation when
> (q->cell_size + q->cell_overhead) is non-positive.
>
> Clamp the effective packet length to 0 if the overhead adjustment
> would underflow, and return 0 delay if effective cell length is
> non-positive, matching the behavior in sch_cake and sch_tbf.
>
> Fixes: 7bc0f28c7a0c ("netem: rate extension")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bui Viet Dung <dungvn2345@gmail.com>
> ---
I would rather cover this corner case in two ways:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 3:56 [PATCH] net/sched: sch_netem: prevent packet length underflow with negative overhead Bui Viet Dung
2026-10-08 3:59 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-11 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-10-12 4:27 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 4:37 ` Bui Viet Dung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261010170341.251cf390@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dungvn2345@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.