From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904304BC007 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791843102; cv=none; b=BBRft0eN6yXmkSj+AzK9o4q7FmPVct+sfwMy58Hmw2cXQV7tU0Z5TCC8uj8eJexrQVv7JpmfN16Vk3/1404n+/rpcGCnoBeeGU4dwPzRVAorbHbDSvqPh6Zs5MzgiQjdjiInU8ai3Nyhwv+/cYvIx0KTojusM0OnlYsVr3CnGeQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791843102; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5F9Qh79QjzMkdjikkpHgt64hgobEhXh5qmXXFQLJSUo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LwohUVZrus/pYmlZG/zed1+Wmir9yEYeLjR1oFVgXl/1u4iIOVeZkzhAPOyersYv6rzk8jdZlT8dSwdgKVte1DpRccUqRNMGY4Br0Xo+RTmT+k7AaqbFtnE2N3lJNPre3ROvBTjibza8rjJswINTqAdPDeRImWRklaydnUqlzk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eBV7yrjW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eBV7yrjW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F1A41F0089B; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:11:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791843096; bh=AU8K80hpmEmQFzWcbpPR8z1hmL1B9Euq8EAxZiUIqCU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=eBV7yrjWklDrn+r+3cQtIN2bqaocj9hNMCMxqJLZpBGG8OgMl40ouIafCYMjUumhR CLxzBCGZ3fhd3QBVfaaDZCGxIgu+DUcpYOnHoxFS9ohJ63RZKXFD9qfu7dX4rfJjZy AhLTWUASAd/YtfiXiqoYJHBrHIUAywiIFPoH/xaXJ4wz2x9F/DdCJ9/f3MVLHDF2A9 js2rW4Qb+nBhpCY4eowfctVg0nU/KQ0R5EfTXlnrH2BVekf6Bzbn5I4C/KCUB5z8vM LCIYL1a1ZXophGnp8M455qXmRSyg21PQtarnGfOUqXUMWILQ+NuK3x3NavMix3tY50 OJ4R+sgkWcn7Q== From: SJ Park To: Roman Gushchin Cc: SJ Park , Andrew Morton , sashiko@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: email handling Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:11:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20261012221129.375576-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <6355837F-7F0E-4C49-B1D4-223296508C18@linux.dev> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sashiko@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:58:56 -0700 Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > On Oct 12, 2026, at 2:25 PM, SJ Park wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > >> On Sat, 10 Oct 2026 15:06:29 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > >> > >> Concerning this email: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/20261009-b4-mmap-prepare-vma-flag-sanify-v5-16-923b70125b1e@kernel.org > >> > >> I discovered that some lucky duckies were receiving Sashiko emails: > > > > Apparently that's because the patch is Cc-ing a few mailing lists that are > > configured [1] to receive the review mails. For example, the patch is Cc-ing > > s390@ mailing list, and it is configured [2] to send the review email to the > > author of the patch, the mailing list, and a few more people including Heiko. > > To quote the config [2], > > > > ["linux-s390@vger.kernel.org"] > > reply_to = ["author", "list"] > > positive_review = "all" > > cc = ["Heiko Carstens ", "Vasily Gorbik ", "Alexander Gordeev ", "Christian Borntraeger "] > > > >> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/38] mm/vma: add and use > >> vma_[flags]_is_fixed_mapping > >> Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev > >> To: =?utf-8?b?TG9yZW56byBTdG9ha2VzIChBUk0p?= > >> Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Vasily > >> Gorbik" , "Oliver Upton" , "Heiko > >> Carstens" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, "Marc > >> Zyngier" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, "Christian > >> Borntraeger" , bpf@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > >> In-Reply-To: <20261009-b4-mmap-prepare-vma-flag-sanify-v5-16-923b70125b1e@kernel.org> > >> References: <20261009-b4-mmap-prepare-vma-flag-sanify-v5-0-923b70125b1e@kernel.org> > >> <20261009-b4-mmap-prepare-vma-flag-sanify-v5-16-923b70125b1e@kernel.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> But I did not. How come? I was on the To: line so why were certain > >> people emailed but not me? > > > > I think that's because you are not on the configuration. > > > >> > >> I'd prefer to receive such replies. > > > > Maybe you could add below change to get replies for mm patches? > > > > diff --git a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml > > index e41f1aa..330d1d8 100644 > > --- a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml > > +++ b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml > > @@ -313,3 +313,6 @@ reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"] > > > > ["fsverity@lists.linux.dev"] > > reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"] > > + > > +["linux-mm@kvack.org"] > > +cc = ["akpm@linux-foundation.org"] > > > > My understanding of Sashiko is quite limited, though. Please correct me if I'm > > wrong, Sashiko team. > > Thanks, SJ. > > I answered Andrew privately, but you’re right, the second option you suggested will subscribe Andrew to all mm reviews. Thank you for confirming, Roman. > Sorry, I did not understand, what limitation are you talking about here? > The only limitation here is the variety of preferences by various maintainers: some push for reply_all lkml-wide, > some hate sashiko’s emails in general. What I wanted to say is that I'm not fully understanding Sashiko code, and hence my above 'mailing_list.toml' edit suggestion might be wrong. It was just for giving Andrew a warning about my suggestion. Now you confirmed my suggestion is not wrong, so no problem here. :) Thanks, SJ [...]