From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com,xiaoyao.li@intel.com,vbabka@kernel.org,vannapurve@google.com,tabba@google.com,surenb@google.com,shuah@kernel.org,seanjc@google.com,rppt@kernel.org,rientjes@google.com,riel@redhat.com,pbonzini@redhat.com,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,michael.roth@amd.com,mhocko@suse.com,ljs@kernel.org,linmiaohe@huawei.com,liam@infradead.org,jiaqiyan@google.com,isaku.yamahata@intel.com,hughd@google.com,hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com,david@kernel.org,dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,andi@firstfloor.org,ackerleytng@google.com,wyihan@google.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-memory_failure-clarify-the-mf_delayed-definition.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 21:33:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261013043300.AD8CF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: memory_failure: clarify the MF_DELAYED definition
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memory_failure-clarify-the-mf_delayed-definition.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
Subject: mm: memory_failure: clarify the MF_DELAYED definition
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:43:47 +0000
Patch series "mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure", v6.
This series addresses an issue in the memory failure handling path where
MF_DELAYED is incorrectly treated as an error. This issue was discovered
while testing memory failure handling for guest_memfd.
The proposed solution involves -
1. Clarifying the definition of MF_DELAYED to mean that memory failure
handling is only partially completed, and that the metadata for the
memory that failed (as in struct page/folio) is still referenced.
2. Updating shmems handling to align with the clarified definition.
3. Updating how the result of .error_remove_folio() is interpreted.
This patch (of 5):
This patch clarifies the definition of MF_DELAYED to represent cases where
a folio's removal is initiated but not immediately completed (e.g., due to
remaining metadata references).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260917-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-v6-0-4b00856b5364@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260917-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-v6-1-4b00856b5364@google.com
Signed-off-by: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-memory_failure-clarify-the-mf_delayed-definition
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -847,24 +847,25 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct
}
/*
- * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* But it could not do more to isolate the page from being accessed again,
* nor does it kill the process. This is extremely rare and one of the
* potential causes is that the page state has been changed due to
* underlying race condition. This is the most severe outcomes.
*
- * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* It should have killed the process, but it can't isolate the page,
* due to conditions such as extra pin, unmap failure, etc. Accessing
* the page again may trigger another MCE and the process will be killed
* by the m-f() handler immediately.
*
- * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
- * The page is unmapped, and is removed from the LRU or file mapping.
- * An attempt to access the page again will trigger page fault and the
- * PF handler will kill the process.
+ * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
+ * It means the page was unmapped and partially isolated (e.g. removed from
+ * file mapping or the LRU) but full cleanup is deferred (e.g. the metadata
+ * for the memory, as in struct page/folio, is still referenced). Any
+ * further access to the page will result in the process being killed.
*
- * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* The page has been completely isolated, that is, unmapped, taken out of
* the buddy system, or hole-punched out of the file mapping.
*/
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from wyihan@google.com are
reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261013043300.AD8CF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wyihan@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.