From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED044F053F; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791892448; cv=none; b=u/1x4bJi/4ea4RBe1wxKYl+d9yLKzjLnH/weqgesMP1cDGLDAa2ZFPXt+6/TA/YSyZttklwzZYOiuQSqF6f6BCADtjk4cGRLTqUj6/ARYkCa2QVvwQViZUrMfQuiMZlX9HqqmRT+SRl5gY7J0fFy7pjXBLyzjhm/D/v1Q2q581g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791892448; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h5WkVlxnruh4peWE+WEIFLns4FrSctMuIroRCKs1mTc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=I2XFGc8ytGA/enmI7aza6zFKun2HKIDykBwz2kZOViNueB/ICbTEXPXlfi26Eowt3XrLVAOgevXqkHzuLLYpGooPMWqdIF/JhNobQ0hIe3mQfE9nTYRPTyAdyAAvLTAeb3zKtRw4EYIqu405XSq1rLtWzZpBogQfZZHI9AyMiBo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=a0aLgP45; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="a0aLgP45" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 318241F00893; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:54:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1791892446; bh=56bGCsKJz+ITSnVuvuNFEzbCVkx+0YMdk/qw8WwkZY4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=a0aLgP45c9DzvNZRDtUa7T9TR5hPhFcI4jOIYDww0MlMtYJu6bXFh9fiLEFpORMDS /eqQUP2FuUxKMk9oSMTW/bAJP0xCpSS3M3SZje8v1R8judecnoqbt5Lu8aMy5rakJ1 u4/Xr9up4M9MZqXNlp1WxLPERQqBN0CI/IWakE/E= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Pauli Virtanen , syzbot+74071deb72339c215b2e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Jiaming Zhang , Mikhail Gavrilov , Luiz Augusto von Dentz Subject: [PATCH 7.2 122/281] Bluetooth: RFCOMM: connect the session socket without rfcomm_mutex Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:37:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20261013112858.110709971@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.56.0 In-Reply-To: <20261013112855.045212108@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20261013112855.045212108@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 7.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Mikhail Gavrilov commit ac022970e9fb0a5f7e7d1f6c8e104c1ed924dd1c upstream. An RFCOMM connect() issued while a BR/EDR link is being authenticated makes lockdep report a circular dependency, and the reported cycle is a real AB/BA between rfcomm_mutex and hdev->lock. rfcomm_security_cfm() is called from the HCI event path, which already holds hdev->lock: hci_rx_work() hci_event_packet() hci_cc_read_enc_key_size() [hdev->lock] hci_encrypt_cfm() [hci_cb_list_lock] rfcomm_security_cfm() [rfcomm_mutex] while an RFCOMM connect() from userspace takes the same two locks the other way round: rfcomm_sock_connect() rfcomm_dlc_open() [rfcomm_mutex] __rfcomm_dlc_open() rfcomm_session_create() kernel_connect() l2cap_sock_connect() l2cap_chan_connect() [hdev->lock] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected kworker/u131:1/1128 is trying to acquire lock: rfcomm_mutex, at: rfcomm_security_cfm+0x31/0x3e0 [rfcomm] but task is already holding lock: hci_cb_list_lock, at: hci_cc_read_enc_key_size+0x1d2/0xcc0 Chain exists of: rfcomm_mutex --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock hci_auth_complete_evt() and hci_encrypt_change_evt() reach the callback the same way. Both orders have to be seen in the same boot, which is why a BR/EDR connection alone is not enough to show it: a session set up by the remote side is created by rfcomm_accept_connection() in krfcommd, which calls kernel_accept() and never takes hdev->lock under rfcomm_mutex. Connecting a device that authenticates and encrypts the link and then calling connect() on an RFCOMM socket towards any address - the connect does not have to succeed, the order is recorded before the page timeout - reports it every time. Only the session socket has to be connected with the lock held, and it does not: nothing else can see the socket before it is put on the session list. So connect it first and take rfcomm_mutex afterwards, which removes the rfcomm_mutex -> hdev->lock order for good, rather than keeping the HCI event path out of rfcomm_mutex. rfcomm_session_create() becomes rfcomm_session_connect(), which returns the connected socket without touching the session list, and rfcomm_dlc_open() adds the session once it holds the lock again. If another opener added a session for the same pair while this socket was connecting, that session is used and this socket is dropped. __rfcomm_dlc_open() now takes the session it should use, and its state check runs after the lock is re-acquired, so a DLC that was opened or closed in the meantime is still handled. Over an existing ACL link the connection can complete before the session reaches the list, and the wakeup from the socket callback is then lost, so krfcommd is woken once the session is visible. Connecting without the lock opens a window in which the socket can be closed. The DLC is not on a session yet, so rfcomm_dlc_close() finds nothing to do and returns without touching it, and rfcomm_dlc_open() would then attach a DLC whose owner is gone. rfcomm_dlc_close() now marks such a DLC with RFCOMM_CLOSED, and rfcomm_dlc_open() checks the mark once it holds rfcomm_mutex again and drops the socket instead of attaching the DLC. The mark is cleared when an open starts, so a DLC that is reused is not affected. This covers both callers of rfcomm_dlc_open(), the socket and the tty layer. Fixes: 759c185d0bbd ("Bluetooth: RFCOMM: serialize security confirmation handling") Suggested-by: Pauli Virtanen Reported-by: Pauli Virtanen Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/5e76a95e934e451e7006db28827c2d64af5a88be.camel@iki.fi/ Reported-by: syzbot+74071deb72339c215b2e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/6a92fadc.08e933ee.dbf97.008f.GAE@google.com/ Reported-by: Jiaming Zhang Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANypQFabseTuRiyz2pGkc_Qj0moGDnY7KEp1qdTOqkw6gAL3hw@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gavrilov Tested-by: syzbot+74071deb72339c215b2e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h | 1 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) --- a/include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ struct rfcomm_dlc { #define RFCOMM_AUTH_REJECT 7 #define RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP 8 #define RFCOMM_ENC_DROP 9 +#define RFCOMM_CLOSED 10 /* Scheduling flags and events */ #define RFCOMM_SCHED_WAKEUP 31 --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c @@ -62,10 +62,9 @@ static void rfcomm_make_uih(struct sk_bu static void rfcomm_process_connect(struct rfcomm_session *s); -static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_session_create(bdaddr_t *src, - bdaddr_t *dst, - u8 sec_level, - int *err); +static struct socket *rfcomm_session_connect(bdaddr_t *src, bdaddr_t *dst, + u8 sec_level, int *err); +static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_session_add(struct socket *sock, int state); static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_session_get(bdaddr_t *src, bdaddr_t *dst); static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_session_del(struct rfcomm_session *s); @@ -365,28 +364,17 @@ static int rfcomm_check_channel(u8 chann return channel < 1 || channel > 30; } -static int __rfcomm_dlc_open(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, bdaddr_t *src, bdaddr_t *dst, u8 channel) +static int __rfcomm_dlc_open(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, struct rfcomm_session *s, + u8 channel) { - struct rfcomm_session *s; - int err = 0; u8 dlci; - BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld %pMR -> %pMR channel %d", - d, d->state, src, dst, channel); - - if (rfcomm_check_channel(channel)) - return -EINVAL; + BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld session %p channel %d", + d, d->state, s, channel); if (d->state != BT_OPEN && d->state != BT_CLOSED) return 0; - s = rfcomm_session_get(src, dst); - if (!s) { - s = rfcomm_session_create(src, dst, d->sec_level, &err); - if (!s) - return err; - } - dlci = __dlci(__session_dir(s), channel); /* Check if DLCI already exists */ @@ -421,14 +409,84 @@ static int __rfcomm_dlc_open(struct rfco int rfcomm_dlc_open(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, bdaddr_t *src, bdaddr_t *dst, u8 channel) { - int r; + struct rfcomm_session *s; + struct socket *sock; + int err; + + BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld %pMR -> %pMR channel %d", + d, d->state, src, dst, channel); + + if (rfcomm_check_channel(channel)) + return -EINVAL; rfcomm_lock(); - r = __rfcomm_dlc_open(d, src, dst, channel); + clear_bit(RFCOMM_CLOSED, &d->flags); + + /* Do not page the remote device for a DLC that cannot be opened + * anyway. __rfcomm_dlc_open() looks at the state again once the + * lock has been re-acquired below. + */ + if (d->state != BT_OPEN && d->state != BT_CLOSED) { + rfcomm_unlock(); + return 0; + } + s = rfcomm_session_get(src, dst); + if (s) { + err = __rfcomm_dlc_open(d, s, channel); + rfcomm_unlock(); + return err; + } rfcomm_unlock(); - return r; + + /* There is no session for this pair yet. kernel_connect() ends up in + * l2cap_chan_connect(), which takes hdev->lock, and the HCI event + * path takes rfcomm_mutex while holding hdev->lock, so the socket has + * to be connected with rfcomm_mutex released. + */ + sock = rfcomm_session_connect(src, dst, d->sec_level, &err); + if (!sock) + return err; + + rfcomm_lock(); + + /* The DLC may have been closed while the socket was connecting. It + * was not on a session, so rfcomm_dlc_close() could only mark it; + * attaching it now would leave it with no owner. + */ + if (test_bit(RFCOMM_CLOSED, &d->flags)) { + rfcomm_unlock(); + sock_release(sock); + return -ECONNRESET; + } + + /* Another opener may have added a session for the same pair in the + * meantime; that one is used and this socket is dropped. + */ + s = rfcomm_session_get(src, dst); + if (!s) { + s = rfcomm_session_add(sock, BT_BOUND); + if (s) { + s->initiator = 1; + sock = NULL; + } + } + + err = s ? __rfcomm_dlc_open(d, s, channel) : -ENOMEM; + + rfcomm_unlock(); + + if (sock) + sock_release(sock); + + /* Over an existing ACL link the connection can complete before the + * session reaches the list, and that wakeup is then lost, so let + * krfcommd look at the socket state now. + */ + rfcomm_schedule(); + + return err; } static void __rfcomm_dlc_disconn(struct rfcomm_dlc *d) @@ -508,8 +566,14 @@ int rfcomm_dlc_close(struct rfcomm_dlc * rfcomm_lock(); s = d->session; - if (!s) + if (!s) { + /* Not on a session yet: rfcomm_dlc_open() may be connecting a + * socket for it with rfcomm_mutex released. Leave a mark so + * that it does not attach the DLC once it holds the lock again. + */ + set_bit(RFCOMM_CLOSED, &d->flags); goto no_session; + } /* after waiting on the mutex check the session still exists * then check the dlc still exists @@ -757,12 +821,12 @@ static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_ses return rfcomm_session_del(s); } -static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_session_create(bdaddr_t *src, - bdaddr_t *dst, - u8 sec_level, - int *err) +/* Creates the L2CAP socket a new session will run on and starts connecting + * it. Must be called with rfcomm_mutex released. + */ +static struct socket *rfcomm_session_connect(bdaddr_t *src, bdaddr_t *dst, + u8 sec_level, int *err) { - struct rfcomm_session *s = NULL; struct sockaddr_l2 addr; struct socket *sock; struct sock *sk; @@ -792,24 +856,16 @@ static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_ses l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->mode = L2CAP_MODE_ERTM; release_sock(sk); - s = rfcomm_session_add(sock, BT_BOUND); - if (!s) { - *err = -ENOMEM; - goto failed; - } - - s->initiator = 1; - bacpy(&addr.l2_bdaddr, dst); addr.l2_family = AF_BLUETOOTH; addr.l2_psm = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_PSM_RFCOMM); addr.l2_cid = 0; addr.l2_bdaddr_type = BDADDR_BREDR; *err = kernel_connect(sock, (struct sockaddr_unsized *)&addr, sizeof(addr), O_NONBLOCK); - if (*err == 0 || *err == -EINPROGRESS) - return s; + if (*err && *err != -EINPROGRESS) + goto failed; - return rfcomm_session_del(s); + return sock; failed: sock_release(sock);