From: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org
Cc: achender@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net/rds: scope-aware sendmsg connection cache
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:23:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261017032358.2563121-1-achender@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi all,
This is v5 of the sendmsg connection-cache scope fix (v1 at [1], v2 at
[2], v3 at [3], v4 at [4]), now against net-next as Jakub suggested:
neither issue has been observed in the field, and both were found by
inspection while reworking this cache for the connection-lifetime
series.
Patch 1 gives the connected peer's link-local scope its own field.
rds_connect() used to store it in rs_bound_scope_id, the scope of
the socket's own bound address, which a later bind() to a
non-link-local address resets to 0 and which a later connect()
pollutes for a globally bound socket. A send without a destination
and getpeername() take the connected peer's scope from that field;
recvmsg() reports a link-local sender with the interface its
connection came in on.
Patch 2 compares c_dev_if with the request's scope in the cache-hit
test, so the cache uses the same key as rds_conn_lookup().
Changes since v4 [4]:
- Patch 1: recvmsg() takes a link-local sender's scope from the
connection the message arrived on (c_dev_if) and reports 0 for any
other sender, instead of the socket's connected or bound scope - a
connected socket receives from any peer, so a per-socket scope was
wrong for every sender but the connected one and could send a
reply out the wrong link (review of v4). getpeername() and
recvmsg() now agree for the connected peer.
- Retargeted at net-next.
Changes since v3 [3]:
- Patch 1: a destination-less send falls back to the bound scope for a
non-link-local peer, so send() and sendto() to the connected peer
compute the same scope; getpeername() and recvmsg() report the
connected peer's scope instead of the bound scope.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260921215046.174745-1-achender@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260927062312.169097-1-achender@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261003163526.250805-1-achender@kernel.org/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261008031426.1142344-1-achender@kernel.org/
Thank you,
Allison
Allison Henderson (2):
net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one
net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check
net/rds/af_rds.c | 15 +++++++++------
net/rds/bind.c | 4 ++--
net/rds/rds.h | 2 ++
net/rds/recv.c | 9 ++++++++-
net/rds/send.c | 9 +++++++--
5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 3:23 Allison Henderson [this message]
2026-10-17 3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one Allison Henderson
2026-10-17 3:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check Allison Henderson
2026-10-17 3:29 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261017032358.2563121-1-achender@kernel.org \
--to=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.