Re: Patch pre-submission to Sashiko

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 20:10:44 +0000
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:

> It sounds like maintainers have drastically different preferences here,
> so I guess a per-mailing list configuration is the only reasonable
> setup? I'm trying to be on a conservative side, so e.g. if there is no
> consensus between maintainers, I do not enable emails.

Right. I have no issue with spamming of sashiko and back. I use
patchwork which is pretty good at only giving me the last version of a
series. And if I see that sashiko made a comment, I would have them
address it before I begin to review the series. Until sashiko is done,
I don't care if they send 11 iterations in a day. It's 11 iterations I
can ignore. In fact, that means I can start looking at it sooner.

As for Andrew's point on testing. I would hope that they would have
tested before sending v1. But sashiko is good at finding things that
tests don't catch. So if they are just fixing sashiko comments, it may
be that their tests are not catching what sashiko is finding. As
sashiko finds new issues with pretty much every new version, I can see
them having to constantly send another version with new info from
sashiko.

-- Steve