From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon/core: filter out damos address filter-split failed region
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 15:02:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261018220253.158238-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
When an address type DAMOS filter is configured, DAMOS tries to split
the region for the filter range, and apply DAMOS action to the filter-in
region. The split operation (damon_split_region_at()) could fail from
allocation failure under extreme memory pressure. In the case, DAMOS
action could be applied more or less than expected, ignoring the address
filter.
The issue only rarely happens under extreme memory pressure. No crash
or leak happens. Occasionally not applying the action to a few regions
shouldn't be a real problem. But applying the action to a region that
the user has excluded via address filter could be a surprise depending
on the use case. It is only theoretical. No such real case is found
yet.
Filter out the entire region if the split is failed. Update
damos_filter_match() signature to receive the error from split. Also
update kunit tests for the updated signature.
The issue was discovered [1] by sashiko.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260801203121.117449-1-sj@kernel.org
Fixes: ab9bda001b68 ("mm/damon/core: introduce address range type damos filter")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.6.x
Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index b63e60ef89901..4d34587387456 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -2551,13 +2551,14 @@ static void damos_update_stat(struct damos *s,
static bool damos_filter_match(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t,
struct damon_region *r, struct damos_filter *filter,
- unsigned long min_region_sz)
+ unsigned long min_region_sz, int *err)
{
bool matched = false;
struct damon_target *ti;
int target_idx = 0;
unsigned long start, end, wsum;
+ *err = 0;
switch (filter->type) {
case DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_TARGET:
damon_for_each_target(ti, ctx) {
@@ -2588,7 +2589,9 @@ static bool damos_filter_match(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t,
break;
}
/* start inside the range */
- damon_split_region_at(t, r, end - r->ar.start);
+ *err = damon_split_region_at(t, r, end - r->ar.start);
+ if (*err)
+ return false;
matched = true;
break;
case DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_PROBE_HITS_WSUM:
@@ -2607,10 +2610,16 @@ static bool damos_core_filter_out(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t,
struct damon_region *r, struct damos *s)
{
struct damos_filter *filter;
+ bool matching;
+ int err;
s->core_filters_allowed = false;
damos_for_each_core_filter(filter, s) {
- if (damos_filter_match(ctx, t, r, filter, ctx->min_region_sz)) {
+ matching = damos_filter_match(ctx, t, r, filter,
+ ctx->min_region_sz, &err);
+ if (err)
+ return true;
+ if (matching) {
if (filter->allow)
s->core_filters_allowed = true;
return !filter->allow;
diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index 3fbb4e4e36fac..43e2f950f8ff4 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -1783,6 +1783,7 @@ static void damos_test_filter_out(struct kunit *test)
struct damon_target *t;
struct damon_region *r, *r2;
struct damos_filter *f;
+ int err;
f = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ADDR, true, false);
if (!f)
@@ -1803,27 +1804,27 @@ static void damos_test_filter_out(struct kunit *test)
damon_add_region(r, t);
/* region in the range */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1, &err));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
/* region before the range */
r->ar.start = 1;
r->ar.end = 2;
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test,
- damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1));
+ damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1, &err));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
/* region after the range */
r->ar.start = 6;
r->ar.end = 8;
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test,
- damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1));
+ damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1, &err));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
/* region started before the range */
r->ar.start = 1;
r->ar.end = 4;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1, &err));
/* filter should have split the region */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 1);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 2);
@@ -1839,7 +1840,7 @@ static void damos_test_filter_out(struct kunit *test)
r->ar.start = 2;
r->ar.end = 8;
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
- damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1));
+ damos_filter_match(NULL, t, r, f, 1, &err));
/* filter should have split the region */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6);
base-commit: dbff06b9dcfe3a45b66fcf20d0fec8c3e56f5624
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 22:02 SJ Park [this message]
2026-10-18 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH] mm/damon/core: filter out damos address filter-split failed region sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 22:13 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261018220253.158238-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.