From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=185.125.25.12 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792444301; b=4Y2SgokpnCQUsVKkbnBkwBwST/y6d6xsQ0R8vDI1eSwmjGoBhp82VfX8KtbeLgGKEm/l O53NbdyfMhc1Fk3d4poubabpbWzyKfBqVISrYgThIZSPtCK0Qk5wtC5eVqEzu/nhsZzys eH3Uo3S7mdpPpZ6j3sfLbLmZRlAMx2FFYzagbD0ju6tQO56sel2AKlNWaTUufeIovcL4T G5gr2+MhPbxtPsg0IZl+0g8vlAcVcKFtPJ+zpEM3+dRW5AUXkNmQ9SGijyiWIciSiaIZG FDSrMqWvnjROB8YWggA5McVrOb1cMhPlRDE3aAQonCsG+R5sQ9+SwjdSrIJSn/ahkdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792444301; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To: X-Infomaniak-Routing; bh=x6AWTd2Xc8o6IHqxSi1c3sHjzBpCh7XHVhu2pJEddeQ=; b=G5aEFLcfze81aY9iGrrWJTPLV6dWCE8hgKW/MrBozex1repU01P4PWkNYEEwa/zK+9CE Pr8EQXEMskX7OOgj6Zx6xQkHE/PzPijHUQYz63/QvXab0PckMdd2c0/aLWteayM4pLtEy 58PEcv+60WpNgh/5KaR8af9etzmOYARSOXBSA7kwpPnOZeKt4W2EdDx7JEjfsLNAaTe5b KNWR3nQLZsIIlGmMR06sbNlP9jdoTNq91LxVpSOWpqUizmd+MTrVAkPNkL76sC6eVcba5 x4AVk2KtSu6CS5FAfrU153Fffb9YMbKGpv2AQQQSjBUyHaMmCSBYI1TQ8Kx4SkR2IWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20191114 header.b=SRhPVjN7; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=185.125.25.12 Received: from smtp-190c.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-190c.mail.infomaniak.ch [185.125.25.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CD75606A31F for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:11:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 0CD75606A31F Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20191114 header.b=SRhPVjN7 Received: from smtp-4-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [IPv6:2001:1600:7:10::a6c]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4j7pBT2yyzzPF7; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:11:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1792444289; bh=x6AWTd2Xc8o6IHqxSi1c3sHjzBpCh7XHVhu2pJEddeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SRhPVjN7pc0iqSmCje3vBHirheLDXLx77MldiqaVXvkUPJrwQ9Y74XQ/oqHOHD1gQ TmoZAwt1CsyRq75AhiabB9gYOfEYHcIVHb7aZ2vBxl6FT9pc59JJaoE0nLoxSo3w1D NSxnGLS3WSs08IoJRRl5t4kR3rXPBZDT5TqAr0Rg= Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4j7pBS5mMmzCP3; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:11:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:11:20 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Mark Brown Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree Message-ID: <20261019.Za1phooV2oom@digikod.net> References: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 07:17:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 01:31:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the landlock tree, today's linux-next arm64 kunit failed > > like this: > > This issue is still present today. I removed these wrong kunit checks Friday so it should be good now, but I notice that linux-next still has the next-20261001/landlock merge commit instead of the latest changes from mic/next (which should not conflict). Could you please confirm that a normal merge works? Regards, Mickaël