From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: [PATCH can-next v4 0/5] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019152741.54854-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net> (raw)
This series fixes a use-after-free in CAN_ISOTP and CAN_BCM that can be
triggered when a CAN device is moved to another network namespace while
a socket bound to this device is released [1].
Only patch 5 is new. Patches 1-4 are already applied to the testing
branch of linux-can-next, and patches 1, 3 and 4 are on their way to
net-next with the linux-can-next pull request [2]. They are included
unchanged only to provide a sequence on which the sashiko bot is able to
build and review patch 5. Please do not apply patches 1-4 from this
series.
The series is based on linux-can-next/testing, which also contains
"can: raw: remove redundant NULL check before netdev_hold()" from [2].
The idea behind patch 5:
The receive lists of a CAN device are located in the device's
can_ml_priv and travel with the device when it is moved to another
network namespace. But they are protected by the per-netns
rcvlists_lock, so the lock that protects a device's lists depends on
the namespace the caller passes to can_rx_register() and
can_rx_unregister(). can_rx_unregister() silently returns when this
namespace does not match dev_net(dev) anymore.
isotp_release() and bcm_release() leave the netdev notifier list before
they can serialize against the notifier. When the device changes its
namespace in this window, their filters are not removed and the
remaining receivers point to the freed socket or bcm op.
Taking RTNL in these release paths is no option, as CAN_RAW already
holds RTNL while adding and removing up to CAN_RAW_FILTER_MAX filters
per socket, which unprivileged users can trigger repeatedly.
Instead, patch 5 protects the receive lists where they are located: A
spinlock in struct can_dev_rcv_lists protects the lists of a CAN device
(initialized in can_set_ml_priv()) or the 'any' CAN device lists of a
namespace (initialized in can_pernet_init()). can_rx_unregister() then
finds the subscription independently of the current namespace of the
device, which is kept accessible by the tracked device references the
protocols already hold. The per-netns rcvlists_lock only protects the
receive list statistics, for which the callers pass the namespace that
has been used for can_rx_register().
As a consequence, CAN_RAW and CAN_ISOTP do not need RTNL in bind(),
setsockopt() and release() anymore. bind() is serialized against
NETDEV_UNREGISTER by publishing the device inside the RCU section of
its lookup, as unlist_netdevice() and synchronize_net() precede
NETDEV_UNREGISTER both on unregistration and on a namespace change.
The notifiers recheck the binding under lock_sock().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/CEA6A38A-2646-4ADA-95B4-CBAE2F301A8E@doyensec.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20261018164417.1540449-1-mkl@pengutronix.de/
Previous versions of patch 5:
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20261018180739.689750-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20261017201935.399233-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/
Oliver Hartkopp (4):
can: proc: skip stats calculation after reset in can_stat_update()
can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
can: replace ARPHRD_CAN type checks with can_get_ml_priv()
can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock
Runyu Xiao (1):
can: proc: reset pkg_stats atomics individually
Documentation/networking/can.rst | 16 ++--
include/linux/can/can-ml.h | 3 +
include/linux/can/core.h | 2 +-
include/net/netns/can.h | 2 +-
net/can/af_can.c | 59 ++++++------
net/can/af_can.h | 2 +-
net/can/bcm.c | 64 +++++--------
net/can/gw.c | 9 +-
net/can/isotp.c | 49 ++++++----
net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +-
net/can/proc.c | 95 ++++++++++++--------
net/can/raw.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
12 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 15:27 Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2026-10-19 15:27 ` [PATCH can-next v4 1/5] can: proc: reset pkg_stats atomics individually Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-19 15:27 ` [PATCH can-next v4 2/5] can: proc: skip stats calculation after reset in can_stat_update() Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-19 15:27 ` [PATCH can-next v4 3/5] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-19 15:27 ` [PATCH can-next v4 4/5] can: replace ARPHRD_CAN type checks with can_get_ml_priv() Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-19 15:27 ` [PATCH can-next v4 5/5] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261019152741.54854-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.