From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:28:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atc6Vczti_EjFrQq@sirena.co.uk>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 11:11:20PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 07:17:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This issue is still present today.
>
> > I removed these wrong kunit checks Friday so it should be good now, but
In fact, I updated mic/next Wednesday with a new patch series addressing
these issues. I only added two (unrelated) commits on top of that
Friday.
> > I notice that linux-next still has the next-20261001/landlock merge
> > commit instead of the latest changes from mic/next (which should not
> > conflict). Could you please confirm that a normal merge works?
>
> It was broken with whatever I fetched yesterday hence me reporting it
> still broken and merging the old version, I've just started the merge
> for today so I'll find out this afternoon if the fix worked.
The new commits from Wednesday don't add the bogus kunit lines (i.e.
there is no kunit_suppressed_warning_count() calls anymore), so it's not
possible to get the same error.
Merging mic/next into the current linux-next works for me, and
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests works too. Please let me
know if anything is wrong.
Regards,
Mickaël
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 0:31 linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree Mark Brown
2026-10-19 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-19 21:11 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 12:28 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.