From: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org
Cc: achender@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net/rds: scope-aware sendmsg connection cache
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:28:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020002816.3087414-1-achender@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi all,
This is v6 of the sendmsg connection-cache scope fix (v1 at [1], v2 at
[2], v3 at [3], v4 at [4], v5 at [5]), against net-next as Jakub
suggested: neither issue has been observed in the field, and both were
found by inspection while reworking this cache for the
connection-lifetime series.
Patch 1 compares c_dev_if with the request's scope in the cache-hit
test, so the cache uses the same key as rds_conn_lookup().
Patch 2 gives the connected peer's link-local scope its own field.
rds_connect() used to store it in rs_bound_scope_id, the scope of
the socket's own bound address, which a later bind() to a
non-link-local address resets to 0 and which a later connect()
pollutes for a globally bound socket. A send without a destination
and getpeername() take the connected peer's scope from that field;
recvmsg() reports a link-local sender with the interface recorded
on its connection.
Changes since v5 [5]:
- Swapped the two patches. The scope-field patch lets a globally
bound socket connect() to the same link-local peer through a second
interface, and without the cache check in place first the next
send() would reuse the first interface's connection, so the series
is now bisectable (review of v5).
- recvmsg() comment and changelog no longer describe c_dev_if as the
arrival interface: that holds for TCP, while the IB passive side
resolves it from the local address (review of v5).
- No code change beyond the comment.
Changes since v4 [4]:
- recvmsg() takes a link-local sender's scope from the connection the
message arrived on (c_dev_if) and reports 0 for any other sender,
instead of the socket's connected or bound scope - a connected
socket receives from any peer, so a per-socket scope was wrong for
every sender but the connected one and could send a reply out the
wrong link (review of v4). getpeername() and recvmsg() now agree
for the connected peer.
- Retargeted at net-next.
Changes since v3 [3]:
- A destination-less send falls back to the bound scope for a
non-link-local peer, so send() and sendto() to the connected peer
compute the same scope; getpeername() and recvmsg() report the
connected peer's scope instead of the bound scope.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260921215046.174745-1-achender@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260927062312.169097-1-achender@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261003163526.250805-1-achender@kernel.org/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261008031426.1142344-1-achender@kernel.org/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261017032358.2563121-1-achender@kernel.org/
Thank you,
Allison
Allison Henderson (2):
net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check
net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one
net/rds/af_rds.c | 15 +++++++++------
net/rds/bind.c | 4 ++--
net/rds/rds.h | 2 ++
net/rds/recv.c | 11 ++++++++++-
net/rds/send.c | 9 +++++++--
5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 0:28 Allison Henderson [this message]
2026-10-20 0:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check Allison Henderson
2026-10-20 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 0:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one Allison Henderson
2026-10-20 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020002816.3087414-1-achender@kernel.org \
--to=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.