All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada <manizada@pm.me>,
	Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] pppoe: delete session hash entries by pointer match
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:21:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020092118.47416-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> (raw)

pppoe_connect() copies the requested PPPoE address to a socket before
attempting to insert the socket into the session hash table. If the
tuple already exists, __set_item() returns -EALREADY, but the copied
address and ifindex remain set on the failed socket.

Closing that socket then deletes the existing socket's hash entry
through pppoe_release(), preventing it from receiving further session
traffic. An unprivileged process in the same network namespace can
trigger this through a duplicate connection attempt.

To avoid the accidental delete, pass the pppox_sock to __delete_item(),
and unlink only an entry whose pointer matches the requested socket.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
index bf7414b46a26..ee0e318d6a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -194,18 +194,16 @@ static int __set_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, struct pppox_sock *po)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void __delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
-					char *addr, int ifindex)
+static void __delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, const struct pppox_sock *po)
 {
-	int hash = hash_item(sid, addr);
+	int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
 	struct pppox_sock *ret, __rcu **src;
 
 	ret = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[hash], lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 	src = &pn->hash_table[hash];
 
 	while (ret) {
-		if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) &&
-		    ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex) {
+		if (ret == po) {
 			struct pppox_sock *next;
 
 			next = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next,
@@ -236,11 +234,10 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 	return po;
 }
 
-static inline void delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
-					char *addr, int ifindex)
+static void delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, const struct pppox_sock *po)
 {
 	spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
-	__delete_item(pn, sid, addr, ifindex);
+	__delete_item(pn, po);
 	spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
 }
 
@@ -570,8 +567,7 @@ static int pppoe_release(struct socket *sock)
 	 * protect "po" from concurrent updates
 	 * on pppoe_flush_dev
 	 */
-	delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote,
-		    po->pppoe_ifindex);
+	delete_item(pn, po);
 
 	sock_orphan(sk);
 	sock->sk = NULL;
@@ -621,8 +617,7 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uservaddr
 	if (stage_session(po->pppoe_pa.sid)) {
 		pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
 		pn = pppoe_pernet(sock_net(sk));
-		delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid,
-			    po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
+		delete_item(pn, po);
 		if (po->pppoe_dev) {
 			dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
 			po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
@@ -672,8 +667,7 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uservaddr
 
 		error = ppp_register_net_channel(dev_net(dev), &po->chan);
 		if (error) {
-			delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid,
-				    po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
+			delete_item(pn, po);
 			goto err_put;
 		}
 
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20  9:21 Qingfang Deng [this message]
2026-10-20  9:24 ` [PATCH net] pppoe: delete session hash entries by pointer match netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-20  9:36   ` Qingfang Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020092118.47416-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --to=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manizada@pm.me \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.