From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1FC606A31C for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=lvBAZ3bY; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=tA113ImI; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=lvBAZ3bY; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=tA113ImI Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7EB3EA609 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3926F3E1271 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88B4100093C for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:06:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2D01F79E; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:06:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1792490803; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bokGfXkZe7bnmgXcIfUjQkULOmehIqZqmcnesW6i8Vs=; b=lvBAZ3bYJPUPzRiZxO6FXxJKzqmnscEBOPeVmsFZ6+cg9Wo05aQUrKEo9gMTX/ECzbAjYV MD+nxU4FZMG4LEZjc1cKJk9D5XiJ4+9DHUozDMoT+EbxofqpUJoJi1nCRgiv15MmOnlU4J 628xtZbDEOLFZpdwKluWWD+195HjTIU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1792490803; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bokGfXkZe7bnmgXcIfUjQkULOmehIqZqmcnesW6i8Vs=; b=tA113ImIgRZ/o3B6b63V5iFhI+acDaQ1rd/hTBBzN+qQY/DcubFI2RmGNGLFP+gWGo2xqr 85nHHVmAgi2iDnBQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1792490803; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bokGfXkZe7bnmgXcIfUjQkULOmehIqZqmcnesW6i8Vs=; b=lvBAZ3bYJPUPzRiZxO6FXxJKzqmnscEBOPeVmsFZ6+cg9Wo05aQUrKEo9gMTX/ECzbAjYV MD+nxU4FZMG4LEZjc1cKJk9D5XiJ4+9DHUozDMoT+EbxofqpUJoJi1nCRgiv15MmOnlU4J 628xtZbDEOLFZpdwKluWWD+195HjTIU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1792490803; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bokGfXkZe7bnmgXcIfUjQkULOmehIqZqmcnesW6i8Vs=; b=tA113ImIgRZ/o3B6b63V5iFhI+acDaQ1rd/hTBBzN+qQY/DcubFI2RmGNGLFP+gWGo2xqr 85nHHVmAgi2iDnBQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD594136C6; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id msrEJTI912qfKAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:06:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:06:41 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20261020100641.GB142152@pevik> References: <20261019131327.GA63027@pevik> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -7.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] nextafter01: Check exact results and convert to new API X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ltp" > Hi Petr, > > ... > > > + if (ret == tc->exp) { > > Hm, we still does not have TST_EXP_EQ_* variant for double. > > Likely not worth of having it (not many tests comparing double). > > Kind regards, > > Petr > actually I think it's a good idea, even if we don't have many examples > like this one. Maybe we can skip it for this time, keeping an eye on > patches to check for similar patterns. +1, once we have it, people can start using it. I suggest: Jan, feel free to merge as is and either send a separate patch to add it or I send a patch to add it later (let's don't block a test rewrite unless you have time to add TST_EXP_EQ_*). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp