From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.128.47 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792509542; b=XYwx3YN3s1Q/DF661n9um9v90exmjtpk2ZgVGRpV/JA+uAe0Pq38Z1nz4zrx+7gIJqjH LQgtvegIy1SCWX9u/NyqsIZDOG7kBqcRBhxX3htHYajPDXEEncDBP5Ja31LQZ1ArJOUKu ktD3t2r4z+mUGdsFnqdv73vWd8xatbpr2oa1eeqXHJv6dIa1bRH7pEwFx9dXXvucXJ3Jz sMqPR92FT6Ang0ewYJ4OEPuiF64XQp2XS+336084mkgylGcA9IZAaZ6LYa/6boJqolc6J UiFnj+YXJ6HJIl+PIq70mKsUPDcaeu4pQQyFaPyfhXO0UhHXJwI11BEnPhcbZoyPyQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792509542; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=PtTdxBCaK4IP3IjSC3LwSEdRzZKszREp9Gn/OsemyOU=; b=QpAG98VIlvDWREck1KrrtS4TYTwQyCOm7UEBfwm/53r1CgunLxG+HQpGURp9HcJJX4rD NNN0RcT+lLkzQcpcKPShTgbmlNRRvxfJdHY8KRwiY7XfZQwSZUX1MNc6akSai8IhTE2C5 P50ac2w1mrcEUEbm5e1Kj+TK1MpYszfxD/ozBnd61bKnlM39Nn+wHxi85znx7mu/nEqbb jRQHmrpj2xcLIRo2PBj/4byemh8liiQnKV2YCz2cJh5ca9TcV1yYaPQOOY33ofPUrsGVr chDV3n+1HO5dn+0tnz423y/pICnrHhC7wVSCXx4tFKug6fySU4jv9CMMUvMqvqnPHxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=XFuJhp80; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.128.47 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com (mail-wm1-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03188606A319 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:19:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 03188606A319 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=XFuJhp80 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a1efc90e7cso5190465e9.1 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792509540; x=1793114340; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PtTdxBCaK4IP3IjSC3LwSEdRzZKszREp9Gn/OsemyOU=; b=XFuJhp80/8pIp4xz+9eTzbRP9QXqCF+5MMZ4eYKZiCgckrjJmCfzfyfNo1c1dSwUYS rTJDvupCCiQyxyBFRnzl2OF9SI89n1KWas15qNuNL1wavkU4fgTDvy5jVeeR4pxi9JRw KS+exgAfWd9LWqDIsLPwZq1kZQ3RoHgUVW//9xyI7Q9dDh3Pi3YvwDEVrtdtCHDIW9/o S9f7HDZObuwt6tOP/T2R7MlBWnIVvoWo6QN5UUWFFB8mdCtKbe2TyDrf4hPObNgeTU2X tYNyGvy80h1SLa7LkQLkc5ZYkP63XA6B/C1xK2LUgvK+CTVKKD2LzKbyFtVssza/aEif TwmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792509540; x=1793114340; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PtTdxBCaK4IP3IjSC3LwSEdRzZKszREp9Gn/OsemyOU=; b=fdLu5uWPHrOjRcu689ynUT2gOD9vHmN2JzVPymxH2xjFtP4rCPDbJc4kwLYg+5uaOK X3v18OimpXxIpniQOCJVVAUCknOJTUIRpsBrMAaniPuOfSpTn8lFi5a+HuNgwImh0wiH 8rjybprenKr8BmDM3KqWRLvT9MnMPFtDCMY6vh6AQQS5cA24BCe1CHU2b8GVAU9jrjRe w0LA7MaXUHWtSPwMEocoJPLitvPuK/JvQRs/IuXmrT+8+2aXJoALPbaM3hh8S/esUTyx ms3APsVeFdiAJqFpHKrRk9Z2oNYt/Y23b610/yo1U08W5Xwzrs9hhgCd4mtlahNCQdIr d17A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwUIppZkUzHT/2f+wV+EccTsWH9nAYDQefj5mDMdRNF6lQYzLZ6Ps2A/RJMyT80DrHVjaoEQvpGBYN/Ig==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIFgDFT38aoGNNvMIxubhp5kr7xmurngcvHld4IghKp7e87MKod 7SjqI/0EWb7Z5IsQycR7Fy5trr6nHZ5SNIhVnqNEmFSQBkkX4rKar/bU X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2LQiAi3ZwheNiw3M9+QCbsvxdEz/UMkvejh2hT1UoQ2MCRPrUJb0KXsufchAO ApyGHcEqVMEtUvxU/lMxOuFURmZAV+slSQUBfDTZiUzB/A0JicyR25/NxrijDr/sYgSVoN2ZMvr 7WWKWJGpQolL6NGMTGNMPxp6QonuhMFN7QGENxHf2T3/ZORr6Dqm+cr6WU0ErfufO6bMxAIOlaP n65uWV38V2VusENRqXGPiQQC8QyYV0BZBFtMAxdsoL0XwykynhbKNxY64gJYCWLvgdC/HN+ZJUs GEv+Xk5t0dZOI6vSWaWd9IOAjrOB4hYPPIeYK2A0FYh+LG2W5QkfqXFHA2akHJZ5gB8MqM5T2rQ JsXwECR3LiZ2qopCDSXCSu4DYPzUc6LlauEfgSB1qP5FN9O/MVILFQ/52QI+EpeayysCVHcupVt jezkThYFhFhk8wbayaId8ljYdHdmv2XgXuTIxBH8nYvFNsEXe2NEx3T46bshT0ePCMjjFuDZLHu ckbUJku7Uf3YFPbkSbaQ/o/lpMq/AV3K27vVtLsc7k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b06:b0:4a1:efbe:529c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a1f4f7fb72mr60920705e9.12.1792509540249; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from andreayoga.wind3.hub ([151.76.51.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a1f2d699dasm84574065e9.12.2026.10.20.08.18.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:18:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrea Parri To: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Cc: Andrea Parri , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Daniel Wagner , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests 0/4] nvme: add nvmet zone report and FC regression tests Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:18:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20261020151854.90498-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20261014170046.2516-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 07:41:42PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote: > Andrea, thank you for this series. I ran the new test cases and they work as > expected. They all failed with the kernel v7.3, and they all passed with the > kernel fix patch series. > > Overall, the patches in this series look good to me. I made some comments for > further improvement. Please check and see if they make sense for you. Thanks for testing and reviewing them. All of your comments make sense to me, and I'll address them in v2: configure nullb1 without calling _init_null_blk(), and use _have_null_blk, so that the tests also run with a built-in null_blk; rename _identify() to issue_identify(); and drop the namespace read from the Identify test. nvme/071 has been taken in the meantime, so v2 will also renumber the tests to nvme/072-074. Thanks, Andrea