All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:51:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020165101.5e74ab2d@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-nice-turquoise-dinosaur-3079bc-mkl@pengutronix.de>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:56:40 +0200
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On 20.10.2026 10:24:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > FYI: there is the kconfig Symbol HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. Can we
> > > make use of it?  
> 
> Just noticed that sashiko's review contained the same remark, but the
> bot only posts to the linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org list, where I'm
> not subscribed:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-178182@kernel.org/
> 
> > That would be better, but I still hope we can just get back to the
> > portable code across all architectures for the in-kernel version.
> >
> > I have one more request for you: can you check /proc/cpu/alignment
> > on the system that shows the performance regression with and without
> > the patch?  
> 
> When booted via NFS-root to the login prompt, we have about 570k System
> alignment fixups, all in the IP stack: :/
> 
> __udp4_lib_rcv+0x78/0xc6c
> icmpv6_echo_reply+0x160/0x504
> ip_send_unicast_reply+0xf0/0x3f8
> ndisc_send_skb+0x15c/0x40c
> rawv6_recvmsg+0x114/0x3b4
> tcp_rcv_established+0x3ec/0xba0
> tcp_v4_fill_cb+0x70/0xec
> tcp_validate_incoming+0x540/0x868
> 
> Comparing v7.0.12 with mainline "unaligned.h" and reverting commit
> a339671db64b ("vdso: Switch get/put_unaligned() from packed struct to
> memcpy()") brings no difference with respect to alignment problems. But
> I see the increase in I/O performance (measured with "fio" [1]) on a
> UBIFS/NAND file system:

So the nand fs is hit by the memcpy() but there are misaligned transfers
in the network stack.
 
> - v7.0.12 NFS root
>   User:           0
>   System:         573956 (tcp_measure_rcv_mss+0xe4/0x1e0)

I can't find __udp_lib_rcv(), but that looks like it could be from expanding
tcp_flag_word(tcp_hdr(skb)).
Which would rather imply that the network driver isn't correctly aligning
all receive packets (honouring NET_IP_ALIGN).

When I were a lad the kernel just paniced and userspace core dumped :-)

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19 20:12 [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5 Ian Rogers
2026-10-19 20:12 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] tools headers: Update the vdso/unaligned.h copy with the kernel sources Ian Rogers
2026-10-19 20:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5 sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 22:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20  6:44   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20  8:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20  8:41       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20  9:06         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20 14:56       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20 15:51         ` David Laight [this message]
2026-10-20 15:54         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20 14:00 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020165101.5e74ab2d@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.