From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792552515; b=S5XmJc+ILkZDBFP5dMPX8MN5WgvlOfPcCu0wZI5KqhStO+7dLDxrv2yK2iYQOZAXSjO9 Lep+FfYNU/kfJ6nQ17UT6AA0UpeQnjSY80B7CaMyjJ0HRhnOragSFJ+5lXh7/hBeRT+uK mLkqAdDazJIgbBTIIx52iitRLGmRS+qDQx4pjlOwR38SVrBHrFk4fLXTzVsCPmiTk1U6J Q2oX97E7+sttjD55Qg1nHPaivbev9y379t9imjskY9/nWCmBIe9inWOhqJlzwAFMt55Vo Ocr/BuaODssLLMUwVHSIngRKE5gpiFRGw6U2DduQYzBeb2H0qPV/KgeRPBy/+gPSNXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792552515; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=Ys8oP0bysBxyVKMvLkKGZUAWfsxvNo0pNAVuTzJHbRQ=; b=DGLYkKa1n8EUA/9PfqByOA5JEOpqylAB4ym3AdJQUdMdE4QqU+SqkPT/BF/W+FTge1hQ wi+17OiVLBD3qkFmMGQHP1PZF7/kGrxYhy1Eb6Yql6On81/rxMfvXOURgstJTDvI8XnKx 7DXj0VDomBYOSZgRsmsMRCTyT67hJ9jGQL220l/UMLUpVNeLhvWbeq0X15An8bg2FsRRt dgsQSYKHpDTiB81vw1GWradNg04lB7yPlZU6XZ/ahbzv85DSfvetZv+BgfLul6AwCN29X kCXpn1s+rNJVLqZL0wypgc+rFo35561Ccn9Ifh+StuFsy2p9dvsckV608OfeTVWizhw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=evDlOaod; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54863606A31B; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 03:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=evDlOaod Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EE231F000C9; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 03:15:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792552514; bh=Ys8oP0bysBxyVKMvLkKGZUAWfsxvNo0pNAVuTzJHbRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=evDlOaodjI+nyT+AchLjNaMkTnceP8J1lq5zDIgnoEJnwGD5JvxB0R0lOQslv787q mLHXpSvBDKXOg5D1weZZdIZGpMyc0YuoMXQCjI1uOxqtME0Fhrm75qrY6hRq3mWTXz xi28526KH11XMEzGGYlJWMYL0ZujoQQkI1PdCiYdxHIYyG3MkoyTvHNIQum7oRdLst xHthLbNIfEC94oQlL1L7+OZGYD0TXIp15rW7iXKoBw3Yo4f/oOmSJpbXHhsKIWzjdA r+0Ww92US795seIaMClJooZENVaG8EVHY1XlTulx/X14sz0t807kEkoUqLOLZ+E6/h YEwMud3Mti3Zg== Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 20:15:13 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Prabhakar Cc: Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Simon Horman , Philipp Zabel , Russell King , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Prabhakar , Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: renesas,rzn1-a5psw: Disallow ports beyond port@4 Message-ID: <20261020201513.7c537f7a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261014131906.990077-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> References: <20261014131906.990077-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20261014131906.990077-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:18:52 +0100 Prabhakar wrote: > Restrict the A5PSW ethernet-ports node to ports 0 through 4, matching the > hardware configuration of four external ports and one CPU/management port. > > Although the schema pattern limits port nodes to port@0 through port@4, > additionalProperties: true allows other port nodes to pass validation. > Set additionalProperties to false and explicitly allow #address-cells > and #size-cells so that ports beyond port@4 are rejected. > > Existing in-tree device trees describe only port@0 through port@4 and > are unaffected by this change. We are closing net-next and this is missing DT review. LLM also found a potential issue here: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261014131906.990077-9-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com -- pw-bot: cr