From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792565701; b=hsbFmq42ct6nG9fX/aJ3q0ibu8bMacv6B3gGLAA0Txh1rLiU+LEMD+0wwiZMcnS6i0wM D++4pTwzTPWIM7hLE8kDHoR7ioJgYHbViZ5c/0PWzNPSCl3fM74BoRie8zMMTeg0tyupH NXdeBHw5NNmNpU/FzAZ5qK4snjbBESvvKO0Z/ia3/PN8LDwmfRmJ9LGQexH9dAbpbnUNm w8vtEQtWPPzMFPJ2Ch6RLmJsvjrUinV+1CvE8289Ra7ZZhkOrfFY7HAf22Wv0yh9FyfXH +XytA6qudPZYCJyKycDWRYPLliOw3t16/o1/Fz062iBy7rCx457hEVN2JnkNH31HhSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792565701; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=1BqHJjII6cVWu3Nsh/HKxlnLNSQZKW3DPQgCR3y1+gs=; b=mjBlrGr6xlta6upmlSR/1GE7fuMm07kqAQ6OlYCImWB3nyXCQKYSboa2zWmBNUenKPH7 oCWovQuAFZhpfCwxz1sMgeRHX5vWvCWuMlL8Cl5hlUMXPCjW/mtlaubqVdc54ms6+t/OJ VjtpVdBM5a4ynjY5KGp3g8DsuvMpnSxkKtwRRgQmG+o3QopnT9L4U2t6+NOgucLMB+zQ6 w6N2nSOYMqjU+uGEcwmps3GtY6Z9WPulfbsCYJep7wiylZ5+4+lqgHALoIG4mil+6ott3 F6sYsSY4iBCq5nFHTL5kjWPGgOnKg1ITioWAE6wpjKLnQ95zWZJo3zDKo3H/T3IsEOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ShpRYgID; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DBB3606A319 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ShpRYgID Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A43921F000C9; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:55:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792565700; bh=1BqHJjII6cVWu3Nsh/HKxlnLNSQZKW3DPQgCR3y1+gs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ShpRYgIDjX4Z3e5gV6DjdlI3C9GSQyFJg5YUhHFvadDaEYWF9fupGDBt7GsX892L5 VX2We0Y9UWHIdFz+5gRi0p5sWpFgaecprP5R0A0F+WD4RqXwll5VrhOUHROD9w0zCa px9Fo7h5xp/swhEeSJZfxDbAIkK8cNJMgHAYKtbRYf3xUgforGosDrMVM8JG1F7Gzs B+QOuwyoeiRAqKV2u+ZGnqK1QS66h3Q36EKHLfOFreYNhxvn17FOByEWfBEMu0lEW4 1mL/WnRuYu56f2GuUffOT4DFW8gkIXt1IEF/tm0GqdLzUPa2ML4B/eOpVs0huV5BXK aBKVZpWPFkAwA== Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:54:59 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Thomas Huth Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Ard Biesheuvel , "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: Enabling Sashiko replies to linux-crypto? Message-ID: <20261021065459.GD31908@sol> References: <20261020215744.GF699485@google.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 08:18:18AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/10/2026 23.57, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Currently, Sashiko is configured (in > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml) > > to monitor linux-crypto for patches, but not to send emails to it. > > > > Would there be any objections to me opening a pull request that changes > > it to the same setting that I set the fscrypt and fsverity lists to? > > > > ["linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org"] > > reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"] > > > > That would enable emails for issues found, with reply-all. > > > > (There's also a 'positive_review = "all"' setting that would enable > > emails for positive reviews, i.e. "Sashiko has reviewed this patch and > > found no issues. It looks great!" But those are kind of noisy.) > Is it possible to configure it in a way that it only sends mails if it > really found something? ... always getting "Sashiko has reviewed this patch > and it looks great" mails is rather annoying than helpful ... Yes, that's what I proposed above (and it's merged now). - Eric