From: Brian Bunker <brian@purestorage.com>
To: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>,
Brian Bunker <brian@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] multipathd: don't leave maps read-only after write protect is cleared
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:19:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021231959.69270-1-brian@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179261848556.617150.17378002460197797656.b4-review@b4>
This is v3. It follows Martin's review of v2: needs_ro_update() now
fetches missing dm info instead of assuming a reload is needed, and
force_readonly is cleared when a load reads it rather than only when
the load succeeds. The changes are listed at the end.
Ben, I dropped your Reviewed-by because the needs_ro_update() logic
changed. The no-dm-info case reverses the "assume it needs to be
reloaded" behavior from 6e40bf92, so please check that you're OK
with it.
A multipath map can stay read-only after write protect is cleared on
the storage, even though all of its paths are read-write. It happens
when the map's paths are removed and re-added while write protect is
set:
1. Write protect is set. The map is reloaded read-only.
uev_update_path() sets force_readonly for that reload and clears it
afterwards.
2. All of the map's paths are removed, and new paths are added while
write protect is still set. ev_add_path() sees a read-only path and
sets force_readonly = 1. Nothing ever clears it.
3. Write protect is cleared on the new paths, one after another. Each
path's DISK_RO=0 uevent is ignored while any path of the map is
still read-only.
4. The last path's uevent reloads the map. The reload sees the stale
force_readonly = 1 and loads the map read-only, logging "reloaded
(retval 0)".
force_readonly only works in one direction: ev_add_path() can set it
but never clears it. If the new paths had been added already writable,
ev_add_path() wouldn't have set the flag and the map wouldn't have
stuck. The paths have to be added while write protected and then
cleared in place.
After step 4 nothing reloads the map again. A rescan doesn't change the
paths' ro state, so it generates no DISK_RO uevent. And since
multipathd now sees the map as read-only, needs_ro_update() also
ignores the next DISK_RO=1 uevent for it.
If two paths' uevents happen to be handled after all paths are
writable, the map does recover: uev_update_path() clears
force_readonly after its reload, so the second reload is read-write.
That makes the problem look intermittent.
Example
-------
We hit this on RHEL 9 device-mapper-multipath 0.8.7, whose
ev_add_path() and uev_update_path() handle force_readonly the same way
as current master. The host's iSCSI sessions were torn down and
re-established while the array was write protecting the volume. From
the messages log, trimmed:
05:48:27 ...114d8: reload [0 51200 multipath 0 1 alua 1 1
service-time 0 6 1 135:272 1 66:624 1 69:720 1 129:560 1
132:656 1 135:752 1]
05:48:27 sdsd: map ...114d8 reloaded (retval 0)
05:51:04 kernel: sd 24:0:0:48: [sdaer] Write Protect is on
05:51:05 ...114d8: remaining active paths: 0
05:51:07 kernel: sd 29:0:0:48: [sdaoi] Write Protect is on
(and four more new paths)
06:09:01 kernel: sd 24:0:0:48: [sdaer] Write Protect is off
06:09:07 kernel: sd 29:0:0:48: [sdaoi] Write Protect is off
06:09:10 sdaoi: update path write_protect to '0' (uevent)
06:09:10 ...114d8: reload [0 51200 multipath 0 1 alua 1 1
service-time 0 6 1 67:880 1 70:992 1 130:848 1 133:960 1
65:1072 1 67:1056 1]
06:09:10 sdaoi: map ...114d8 reloaded (retval 0)
The state afterwards, as recorded by the test:
dm-106: ro
sdaer: rw sdagu: rw sdaix: rw sdala: rw sdand: rw sdaoi: rw
The patch
---------
The patch sets force_readonly right before each load from the state of
the map's paths, and dm_addmap_create() and dm_addmap_reload() clear it
as soon as they have read it. needs_ro_update() sets it for the reload
done for a DISK_RO uevent, and ev_add_path() and update_map() compute
it from all of the map's paths. With the patch, the 06:09:10 reload
would have found no read-only path and loaded the map read-write.
Changes since v2:
- In needs_ro_update(), fetch the dm info with dm_get_info() if the
map has none, and return false if that fails, instead of assuming a
reload is needed. This also removes the separate path walk for that
case.
- Clear force_readonly in dm_addmap_create() and dm_addmap_reload() as
soon as they have read it, instead of in dm_addmap() on success. A
failed load can no longer leave the flag set for a later, unrelated
reload, such as one for a path group change. needs_ro_update() no
longer needs to clear the flag itself.
- I didn't add per-path tracking of the ro state. force_readonly is
only computed from sysfs right before a load, which is rare, so the
cost of reading sysfs there is small. Per-path tracking could be a
follow-up if you want it.
Changes since v1:
- Set force_readonly in needs_ro_update() when it returns true,
instead of in uev_update_path(). The DISK_RO=1 case uses the uevent
again, rather than rereading sysfs.
- Clear force_readonly in dm_addmap() on success, as for need_reload,
instead of after the loads in ev_add_path() and uev_update_path().
- In ev_add_path(), only compute force_readonly when need_do_map is
set.
- Walk mpp->pg rather than mpp->paths in needs_ro_update(), since
mpp->paths may be stale there. ev_add_path() and update_map() still
use mpp->paths: both call adopt_paths() first, and mpp->pg doesn't
contain the new paths until setup_map().
- Move sysfs_get_ro() above has_ro_path() instead of adding a forward
declaration. The function is unchanged.
Brian Bunker (1):
multipathd: don't leave maps read-only after write protect is cleared
libmultipath/devmapper.c | 17 +++++--
multipathd/main.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 18:27 [PATCH v2 0/1] multipathd: don't leave maps read-only after write protect is cleared Brian Bunker
2026-10-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Brian Bunker
2026-10-21 19:50 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-10-21 21:34 ` mwilck
2026-10-21 23:19 ` Brian Bunker [this message]
2026-10-21 23:19 ` [PATCH v3 " Brian Bunker
2026-10-22 20:17 ` Martin Wilck
2026-10-23 0:24 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-10-23 20:50 ` Martin Wilck
2026-10-23 23:40 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-10-26 9:26 ` Martin Wilck
2026-10-26 18:04 ` Brian Bunker
2026-10-26 22:23 ` Martin Wilck
2026-10-27 4:29 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-10-26 22:20 ` Martin Wilck
2026-10-27 4:52 ` Benjamin Marzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261021231959.69270-1-brian@purestorage.com \
--to=brian@purestorage.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.