From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.128.180 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792718180; b=L8H8EGyfILBboWez0cJsBXrk7U2O7A6QQxc360oBTQClANfWLrDaQ8I8u8vJJJkGKbbN nIOBubwzd9k6FdBQNe73Ox4TQYJuhF5k344beI30RV8tugcx181usKRYyzKgYg5fdW6f7 UXZ00nYGVSq4twE7H/sM7mWKJ4+dGjVi/oTB4loWzA0Y0dSIge5v1uKbCxxT9Iawztsay 4ctIa2RsDj/SDSsYXFklPhEthxzLcToSM7utcN7kExhz8/UuYmsrT2B0xpDdLC9cTdssB nUlKmr7msADsb0fiEzxvDngtevETwntC39J3VX/rQIJKLaAJGkEm6mGuOS6UK2LVFbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792718180; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=2HapOEWexndyRKjnvata6NJwZGi4u1g4sDf1cYEK7hg=; b=VMXWJjes0HGJTpsuar4xGj4Ai40n4tJxf2PDH9SIaj58QldRKIwgRTL8kedLmeyKRzRD 6B+feImQQgeUnFUF6FTvNj4R6ILo1q1vQVoXj2pNiyFOwmOiWbuWZMQ8ASGMpLkVGoYfz tz9DEgiMQ1pgvDoQgywm5XPaat49e3k4RAB2mQjnhtAnojiOro4hR5xG4ayIvEVxt4TOb WGgJw/aSwl1RlRH4Z99ABAi1uqkiGIN9EB/8XYfiQJHK8pKSblSJYgVPC422sQyapqjgw f5QWOxebFkJp+pKdLWlAdXbaq6XHqmMOGJ61ar1o2c1HI5/Nwtb1kOh9uiepJIZx74w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=QWe5zwjq; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.128.180 Received: from mail-yw1-f180.google.com (mail-yw1-f180.google.com [209.85.128.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85E0606A31A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:16:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org A85E0606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=QWe5zwjq Received: by mail-yw1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-8b056d58f2aso3907537b3.2 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792718179; x=1793322979; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=2HapOEWexndyRKjnvata6NJwZGi4u1g4sDf1cYEK7hg=; b=QWe5zwjqI3IuzOh22/ojD7rCDR2ehMYe25H3ghjGtp6ju0hdKTrmg9RDvZn1nkRQEw 2PvC0yzo73M7Z4JttVjXJ/+4f1m7BMqpco2OveOtjeNfri2mgaVV/lPqvFlXDvivjjMd cCfRgFAzH1FHFpDNOxrE3TqBLt8tua97y6zojBJ/bymIDVjoSCPX4vFEnIUz0QsLSyuT uqdA52RdIIkuk6wmtboG2KQVC/F+hJkcgi6Zs4K2/ZvgHxKEoTrlopPRoZExCmsTLuYD 8yfX8G+KgyCzmh0OIEPDDQv7x+mcuBDDTdfLEcssD9rhhx5XhVWXdPc/ZYuRmFojjr8N GTpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792718179; x=1793322979; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=2HapOEWexndyRKjnvata6NJwZGi4u1g4sDf1cYEK7hg=; b=zZiAGvwMOMDHXpTZbWWXPHghU24zbD+zYHHjQUT8Q2gytBVTZs1yp1m1mmF+ApOzWN PJbf5t2OzIRu6ehf6k4siXxWraLVx8pWCba4dnElQlxBoQ5JANljo99iiqxTTT/GHnWP RJji2Y5rWoSQ4MvoD0Bes/MBb+qtpdfmxpl0snIoriQ8a6ohJg+7RcPBNJq6qFjYrLbm y/z4jTtPgzYtHheGMWUrCJ3mDZL1+Uu8r/fzUCiul3UK8jiGXt8x/WIleOnrw5uue1KS q9q+F1w8JZLzdYpqKPlSZLr+ZlQ2nQR6HfmkImzxgxakwF8N8RANiyYGbJFr1tieKzhH qoGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIjS8lxLyrAWnRz9yK0yf/fneTS9/gnHL2xeFS95Dd+RZqn1Jxw iWdncEUlKEf3OL1bDxbr7Ke170X4nF/ngNb3OHeVf+9oNomc7Wb8X/VVC87ziA== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0vvByVuABuIhoh45J2fspM88izozC0mUSYG6r4epx6QxgFupMpT4yCTdDcisY jFAu+/VeocPvZrfJAMECzCrq7McaDaPh1Pg0iHJBOodCrP1zeRDnquLFzFlqOvgY4BP5Af0kVVX qsSNMCXX7eZLoH1TPoRvfon9Q/CH1R0mv3GoAUa+mELde5Nq15qNa90vXIqwzd3S6ZCPUh0efaP eqKGHhLmTPw8DXj/YEx4f8HD0YsXJ63yoGQlPcJm4IpssE3+H6GEMdp2bkOU//UD1G6P5gG5kyx /ZyK51VQJf9QVuvlrmqf6Y4/Fwx3jUhjYoeZloSg3Jz0Yo+qm9xx6r4BmJeDscFjyWtSKkkPTD1 0Fe5jyzLLoRjrUEa3W3a888ORMfbavqgCfU8JEH/LVGLuCxtEXkSli7WH9RToa+AeUSIFL5qag0 HeHI4HE+ybHu5DuACCgXkr/CukGthnUxWOL8sVn+iWjurHUm7PxvQUbXgiIqrfWVoiQ7SqzNCBJ tK+m4xEgZbTGLcXLx4BGSeTFnFw5U+CFJ/c59hkypPQTD3ZtbN6o3pvASRjlYj9uWnLPscHqmXI e359fNFYdtCU9JjVs/uDjhkriEs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:91:b0:8b1:1dd8:1d74 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-8b157e37c8fmr5356437b3.65.1792718178486; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop01 (2045061-002-static.lfytina2.metronetinc.net. [149.154.21.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-8b156183032sm6552567b3.34.2026.10.22.18.16.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:16:16 -0400 From: Chih-En Lin To: Roman Gushchin Cc: sashiko@lists.linux.dev, Chris Mason , rawat10@purdue.edu, pfonseca@purdue.edu Subject: Re: [RFC] new design of review prompts management Message-ID: <20261023011616.GA6628@laptop01> References: <20261021234442.136214-1-shiyn.lin@gmail.com> <7ia45wyty0ph.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> X-Mailing-List: sashiko@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ia45wyty0ph.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 07:50:02PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote: > Chih-En Lin writes: > > > Hi all, > > Hello, > > Thank you for the proposal! Hi, Thanks for the reply! > Many ideas here resonate with what I was working on/was thinking of > recently. I'm about to publish a big rework of prompts which separates > them in auto-generated part and subjective small part for maintainers. I wonder if that are: https://lore.kernel.org/sashiko/91e21331-ed6d-4ac0-b237-b01aeadca2d1@app.fastmail.com/ https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts.git subsystem-build > It's somewhat close to what you're proposing, but not fully. Let's maybe > restart this discussion after this? Sure :-) > I'm sure there will be a ton of room for further improvements... We actually have other more ideas (included and not included in [1]) to improve this type of patch review system, but most of them are based on the invariant unit. And, since the kernel community has one already, we are happy to contribute. Thanks, Chih-En Lin --- [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24825