From: Kamil Sawicki <user148783812897@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: limit priority VLAN untag depth
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:48:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024004835.17862-1-user148783812897@gmail.com> (raw)
The priority VLAN receive path can repeatedly remove VID 0 tags and retry
packet processing. Unlike the read-only VLAN protocol parser, this path has
no limit on the number of nested tags it consumes.
Each skb_vlan_untag() advances skb->data and resets header offsets. The
offsets are stored in 16-bit fields. With enough nested tags, the network
or transport offset can wrap. A later protocol handler can then derive a
large pull length from the wrapped offsets and access memory outside the
skb allocation.
Apply the existing VLAN_MAX_DEPTH limit to the exceptional VID 0 retry.
Count the tag already stored in skb VLAN metadata as the first level, then
stop before untagging a ninth level. Keep the accounting inside this
uncommon branch so the regular VLAN receive path is unaffected.
A single VID 0 priority tag before a real VLAN tag is valid. No normal
deployment was found that intentionally emits multiple consecutive VID 0
tags; permitting eight levels is therefore conservative.
The issue was found while researching the Linux network receive path for
Google kvmCTF, with OpenAI Codex (gpt-5.6-sol) assisting the analysis. The
affected path, reproducer and fix were manually reviewed and tested.
Fixes: 36b2f61a42c2 ("net: handle 802.1P vlan 0 packets properly")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamil Sawicki <user148783812897@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- rename vlan_depth to priority_tag_depth
- report SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT when the limit is reached
- address the expected real-world tag depth in the commit message
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261023003750.1133904-1-user148783812897@gmail.com/
Runtime-tested on net/main f4377bf85887 (7.3-rc7) with KASAN. The
patched kernel blocked the nested vhost/TAP trigger on five fresh boots;
each run recorded eight skb_vlan_untag() calls, no tcp_v4_rcv() call and
no KASAN report. The eight-tag packet was delivered, the nine-tag packet
was dropped, and kfree_skb recorded SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT for
all three nine-tag test transmissions.
The fragmented-head test stopped after eight untag calls without reaching
IPv4 or TCP. A 100,044-byte nonlinear GSO skb crossed two VID 0 tags, and
a 32 MiB BIG TCP transfer completed with matching hashes and skb lengths
up to 130,376 bytes. The 31-sample protocol-253 control recorded no matching
skb_copy_and_csum_bits() call and no shadow-probe hit.
Rebased onto current net/main 734bef548a96 without changing the patch-id.
Strict checkpatch and W=1 net/core/dev.o builds using allyesconfig and
allmodconfig completed without warnings.
net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1a09e786911805..c9f07beee25782 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6306,6 +6306,8 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
}
if (unlikely(skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) && !netdev_uses_dsa(skb->dev)) {
+ unsigned int priority_tag_depth = 1;
+
check_vlan_id:
if (skb_vlan_tag_get_id(skb)) {
/* Vlan id is non 0 and vlan_do_receive() above couldn't
@@ -6317,6 +6319,12 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
* 802.1Q or 802.1AD and vlan_do_receive() above could
* not find vlan dev for vlan id 0.
*/
+ if (unlikely(priority_tag_depth >= VLAN_MAX_DEPTH)) {
+ drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT;
+ goto drop;
+ }
+
+ priority_tag_depth++;
__vlan_hwaccel_clear_tag(skb);
skb = skb_vlan_untag(skb);
if (unlikely(!skb))
base-commit: 734bef548a96e8774d6eef5dfa2026c6edc4e80b
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 0:48 Kamil Sawicki [this message]
2026-10-24 8:22 ` [PATCH net v2] net: limit priority VLAN untag depth Eric Dumazet
2026-10-27 1:40 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 7:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-27 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261024004835.17862-1-user148783812897@gmail.com \
--to=user148783812897@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.