From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ziy@nvidia.com,yukuai@fnnas.com,yizhang089@gmail.com,yangerkun@huawei.com,willy@infradead.org,wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,vbabka@kernel.org,surenb@google.com,rppt@kernel.org,mhocko@suse.com,ljs@kernel.org,liam@infradead.org,joannelkoong@gmail.com,jack@suse.cz,hughd@google.com,djwong@kernel.org,david@kernel.org,chengzhihao1@huawei.com,bfoster@redhat.com,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,yi.zhang@huawei.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-truncate-clarify-return-value-of-truncate_inode_partial_folio.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 01:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024085809.BBF741F01825@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/truncate: clarify return value of truncate_inode_partial_folio()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-truncate-clarify-return-value-of-truncate_inode_partial_folio.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: mm/truncate: clarify return value of truncate_inode_partial_folio()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:08:33 +0800
With the earlier rework the callers no longer rely on the return value of
truncate_inode_partial_folio() to decide whether to adjust the truncation
range. The pstart/pend out-parameters carry that information instead.
The callers now only use the return value as a flag indicating whether the
loop should be reset to pick up newly split sub-folios on the shmem path.
Return true if at least one split succeeded, and false otherwise. This
clarifies the existing confusing return value semantics.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260928120833.3440834-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <yizhang089@gmail.com>
Cc: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: <yukuai@fnnas.com>
---
mm/truncate.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/truncate.c~mm-truncate-clarify-return-value-of-truncate_inode_partial_folio
+++ a/mm/truncate.c
@@ -216,8 +216,7 @@ static int folio_split_or_unmap(struct f
* aligned inwards to min_order, i.e. the range of folios wholly within
* [lstart, lend] and so safe to discard.
*
- * Returns false if splitting failed so the caller can avoid
- * discarding the entire folio which is stubbornly unsplit.
+ * Return %true if at least one split succeeded, %false otherwise.
*/
bool truncate_inode_partial_folio(struct folio *folio, loff_t lstart,
loff_t lend, pgoff_t *pstart, pgoff_t *pend)
@@ -247,7 +246,7 @@ bool truncate_inode_partial_folio(struct
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
if (length == size) {
truncate_inode_folio(folio->mapping, folio);
- return true;
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -264,7 +263,7 @@ bool truncate_inode_partial_folio(struct
min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
min_nrbytes = mapping_min_folio_nrbytes(folio->mapping);
if (folio_order(folio) == min_order)
- return true;
+ return false;
split_at = folio_page(folio, PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(offset) / PAGE_SIZE);
if (!folio_split_or_unmap(folio, split_at, min_order)) {
@@ -327,10 +326,9 @@ out:
*pend = end;
return true;
}
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
- return false;
- truncate_inode_folio(folio->mapping, folio);
- return true;
+ if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
+ truncate_inode_folio(folio->mapping, folio);
+ return false;
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yi.zhang@huawei.com are
reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261024085809.BBF741F01825@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yizhang089@gmail.com \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.