All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,vbabka@kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,ljs@kernel.org,liam@infradead.org,jannh@google.com,gourry@gourry.net,david@kernel.org,albinwyang@tencent.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-madvise-add-cond_resched-in-thp-branch-of-madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 02:01:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024090106.5DDAE1F01825@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/madvise: add cond_resched() in THP branch of madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-madvise-add-cond_resched-in-thp-branch-of-madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com>
Subject: mm/madvise: add cond_resched() in THP branch of madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range()
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 10:40:42 +0800

During stress testing with stress-ng on a 256-CPU system, a softlockup was
observed when madvise(MADV_COLD) was called on a 31GB memory region backed
by transparent hugepages.  The region contains 15935 THP PMD entries, and
the softlockup was triggered after 14485 of them had been processed.

The THP branch of madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() has no scheduling
point.  walk_pmd_range() invokes it once per 2MB PMD entry with no
cond_resched() anywhere in the loop.  Each iteration calls
pmdp_invalidate() which issues a synchronous TLB shootdown (dsb ish)
waiting for all CPUs to acknowledge.  This operation can be time-consuming
under heavy system load, causing the accumulated time across all PMD
entries to exceed the softlockup threshold (20s) and panic when
softlockup_panic=1.  On a CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y kernel, there is no other
opportunity to reschedule during this entire traversal.

The regular PTE path already has an unconditional cond_resched() at the
function tail (introduced by commit 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce
MADV_COLD") and commit 1a4e58cce84e ("mm: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT") when
MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT were first introduced) and a conditional one
inside the loop (commit b2f557a21bc8 ("mm/madvise: add cond_resched() in
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range()")).  The THP branch never received
equivalent treatment.

Fix by adding cond_resched() at the huge_unlock exit path after
spin_unlock(ptl) and reclaim_pages(), which is the single exit point for
all goto paths in the THP branch.

Crash log:
  watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#63 stuck for 23s! [stress-ng-vm:1665914]
  ...
  Call trace:
  pmdp_invalidate+0x48/0x68
  madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range+0x84c/0xb00
  walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0x1ac/0x3b0
  walk_pud_range+0x120/0x190
  walk_pgd_range+0x170/0x1b8
  __walk_page_range+0x184/0x198
  walk_page_range_vma+0x94/0x128
  madvise_cold+0xd8/0x198
  madvise_vma_behavior+0x234/0x638
  madvise_walk_vmas.constprop.0+0xdc/0x210
  madvise_do_behavior+0xa8/0x328
  do_madvise+0xd8/0x140
  __arm64_sys_madvise+0x2c/0xe0

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261010024042.4070048-1-albin_yang@163.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---

 mm/madvise.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/mm/madvise.c~mm-madvise-add-cond_resched-in-thp-branch-of-madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range
+++ a/mm/madvise.c
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ huge_unlock:
 		spin_unlock(ptl);
 		if (pageout)
 			reclaim_pages(&folio_list);
+		cond_resched();
 		return 0;
 	}
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from albinwyang@tencent.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2026-10-24  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261024090106.5DDAE1F01825@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=albinwyang@tencent.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.