From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/6] mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 18:11:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024221152.6965-4-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261024221152.6965-1-snitzer@kernel.org>
A folio allocated by an RWF_DONTCACHE write is marked dropbehind before
it is dirtied, so folio_account_dirtied() adds it to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY
and folio_clear_dirty_for_io() or folio_account_cleaned() subtracts it
when it is cleaned. Nothing marks a folio that already exists. A
caller that sets PG_dropbehind on a folio that is already dirty
unbalances the counter: the clean subtracts what was never added, and
once the counter goes negative, wb_stat_sum() reads it as zero and the
DONTCACHE writeback kick stops writing anything back for every writer
on that bdi_writeback.
Add folio_mark_dropbehind(), the inverse of the clear in
__filemap_get_folio_mpol(): with the folio locked, mark it and, if it
has been counted as dirty, add it to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY. Neither
PG_dirty nor the dirty tag alone says that the folio is counted.
filemap_dirty_folio() sets PG_dirty before folio_account_dirtied()
counts the folio, under the i_pages lock and without the folio lock. A
folio marked between the two would be counted twice.
__folio_cancel_dirty() uncounts a folio and clears PG_dirty, but leaves
the tag until writeback or truncation clears it. A folio marked with
that stale tag would be counted and never uncounted.
folio_account_dirtied() sets the tag in the same i_pages section that
counts the folio, and every path that uncounts a dirty folio holds the
folio lock. So set the flag and test both under the i_pages lock, and
count the folio only when both are set. A dirtier not yet counting the
folio finds the flag set and counts it itself. Under that lock the wb
is inode_to_wb(),
as in folio_account_dirtied(). A concurrent lookup without
FGP_DONTCACHE that clears the flag again subtracts what this added.
The name follows folio_set_dirty() and folio_mark_dirty(): the first
only sets PG_dirty, the second also accounts the dirty folio.
folio_set_dropbehind() likewise only sets PG_dropbehind, and
folio_mark_dropbehind() also accounts it in WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY.
A later commit uses it in NFSD to drop a page shared by two misaligned
WRITEs once both have written it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
---
Notes:
Notes on the v8 review questions, with the code that answers each:
- Counting rule. The same rule as filemap_clear_dropbehind() in
1/6: folio_mark_dropbehind() counts the folio only when
folio_test_dirty() and PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY are both true. The
test is under the folio lock (VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO checks it) and
the i_pages lock. A stale tag on a clean folio does not add a
count.
- Double count. A folio that has PG_dropbehind returns at the first
test, before it changes the count.
- No writeback. A mapping without writeback gets only the flag.
folio_account_dirtied() does not count such a folio either
(mapping_can_writeback()).
include/linux/pagemap.h | 1 +
mm/filemap.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 0adfa6605653d..3012bd95812a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ void end_page_writeback(struct page *page);
void folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio);
void folio_end_writeback_no_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
void folio_end_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
+void folio_mark_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
void folio_wait_stable(struct folio *folio);
void __folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *, int warn);
void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct bdi_writeback *wb);
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 5176c4125a4db..d0e4d1788fd40 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1644,6 +1644,48 @@ void folio_end_dropbehind(struct folio *folio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_end_dropbehind);
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dropbehind - mark an existing folio dropbehind
+ * @folio: the folio, locked by the caller
+ *
+ * Mark @folio so that the writeback that cleans it drops it. A folio
+ * already counted as dirty is added to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY, as
+ * folio_account_dirtied() would have added it had it been marked when
+ * dirtied, so that the clean that subtracts it leaves the counter balanced.
+ *
+ * folio_account_dirtied() counts a folio under the i_pages lock, in the
+ * section that sets its dirty tag, after PG_dirty has been set without the
+ * folio lock. Every path that uncounts a dirty folio holds the folio lock.
+ * So with the folio locked and the i_pages lock held, the folio is counted
+ * when both PG_dirty and the dirty tag are set. PG_dirty alone is not
+ * enough: a dirtier past folio_test_set_dirty() but not yet counting finds
+ * the flag set and adds the folio itself. The tag alone is not enough
+ * either: __folio_cancel_dirty() uncounts a folio and clears PG_dirty, but
+ * leaves the tag until writeback or truncation clears it.
+ */
+void folio_mark_dropbehind(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+
+ if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
+ return;
+ if (!mapping || !mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) {
+ folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
+ return;
+ }
+ xa_lock_irqsave(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
+ folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio) &&
+ xa_get_mark(&mapping->i_pages, folio->index, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
+ wb_stat_mod(inode_to_wb(mapping->host), WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY,
+ folio_nr_pages(folio));
+ xa_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_mark_dropbehind);
+
/**
* folio_end_writeback_no_dropbehind - End writeback against a folio.
* @folio: The folio.
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 22:11 [PATCH v9 0/6] mm, iomap, NFSD: stop uncached writes reading back shared pages Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] mm: take a folio off WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY only if it was counted there Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] mm: expose WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY in bdi debugfs stats Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2026-10-25 22:12 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 6:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] mm, iomap: keep a partly covered page until an uncached write completes it Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] mm, iomap: let an uncached writer complete its shared pages itself Mike Snitzer
2026-10-24 22:11 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] NFSD: drop a shared boundary page only once both WRITEs have written it Mike Snitzer
2026-10-25 22:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 6:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2026-10-27 14:31 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] mm, iomap, NFSD: stop uncached writes reading back shared pages Jeff Layton
2026-10-27 15:36 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-28 5:12 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261024221152.6965-4-snitzer@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.