From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9132D606A31E for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=tkv8gzJz; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=HTjexBqM; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=tkv8gzJz; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=HTjexBqM Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC083E5FEC for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:06:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8203CCE09 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:06:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D96100023E for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:06:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36791F7D7; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:06:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1793016400; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L29TAHnnz3VGOgaaEIBVWw6pHHAbqBKRVdo3EyRNgnc=; b=tkv8gzJzjqhqArmXGqGxWZ3TN74JvWiQ3ebTtQXStV4BZq2xc77sCfAvR67JA2TcTDZxMe 6WpKYJIjNqdhKlrrgyTYF9MdjtcQlVBAhbm9Je4UXPLByeDdeHEYFHm3GKs+FA3CWUVj8t 4nVnXJKugDn7JBlps24Maa4OaQZt/kM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1793016400; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L29TAHnnz3VGOgaaEIBVWw6pHHAbqBKRVdo3EyRNgnc=; b=HTjexBqMincWfoDdIBqTNu2ujTVhEq4zWMtkddEXd2oWt10SHkym4E8AFsWya9xtmc02Tz PV4JmaJy3tH+hQCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=tkv8gzJz; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=HTjexBqM DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1793016400; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L29TAHnnz3VGOgaaEIBVWw6pHHAbqBKRVdo3EyRNgnc=; b=tkv8gzJzjqhqArmXGqGxWZ3TN74JvWiQ3ebTtQXStV4BZq2xc77sCfAvR67JA2TcTDZxMe 6WpKYJIjNqdhKlrrgyTYF9MdjtcQlVBAhbm9Je4UXPLByeDdeHEYFHm3GKs+FA3CWUVj8t 4nVnXJKugDn7JBlps24Maa4OaQZt/kM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1793016400; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L29TAHnnz3VGOgaaEIBVWw6pHHAbqBKRVdo3EyRNgnc=; b=HTjexBqMincWfoDdIBqTNu2ujTVhEq4zWMtkddEXd2oWt10SHkym4E8AFsWya9xtmc02Tz PV4JmaJy3tH+hQCA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767B213319; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id /wlzE1BC32r1HwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:06:40 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:06:34 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20261026120634.GA548773@pevik> References: <20261022022824.19735-1-wegao@suse.com> <20261022022824.19735-3-wegao@suse.com> <20261022154436.GA419745@pevik> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B36791F7D7 X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-12.71 / 50.00]; SUSE_INTERNAL_BYPASS(-9.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:replyto]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: -12.71 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v16 2/2] open16: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > > + exit(0); > > > Do we need this explicit exit? > > Yes i think exit(0) is necessary because only the child process reaches this point. > Any child that returns to the test library calls exit(0). Thanks, Cyril, for confirmation. Yet another rule https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp-agent/pull/12 Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp