From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793229788; b=LEvw6FTubVr+bvEahj1B6MCNs83q+2YZwQHK9X2vH4HH6XYkweghb9AVKBMJcAlLxVhm GeT0N2lXt8EgjEZifT0Rk0OtR5i4j95lhZX611zX5RFWEsLIEr8v2PbWdTPdm9w0PP3su 8WtYisRQS6faadajcu680T4K/1GIEc7L9zqTAU4Gfkw05ZLV9nDKpRcQMv2+lZtkAlGIo cJf+caDrpf8gfV9OxNayxSCpKf6HmUQR2ysGpTtV3bzHFUYkpf3JOZ76qQjMsmXstFhRg BC9VJcEsGNWHjkzxSl4dBqi3GqrPif4/K0EZ2jMcChMzkDxT/d+m/wzPXoH5H6FzI1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793229788; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=siS9tKJrzzyUZocyxRqmx7YU4OiiuwHiHfyCYQ99NZI=; b=jbSRX65EcdKfhRoUxsiYnh4sxLXhYc5g+/YCkcNbqdyS/IQmi8gtZuksz47jgjcYBjFw Th6IrfhaxKVRkO/yay+VFnVaIbQYYtg5nSN7QvQ3n3svGsPSEKvFUffLzLl7joHR5GGZ4 UK7QO+ovg6Yv0wjatJ3/jgGfsWAMmSFZl5SVhfoVGnpkY54YvNMt2q0BUFP9XI+YGDeV6 AAj4ydbgCCSfDHMFDuDRvilaJjrjZNtzECJg3s0tdNT1hKavJMJBClqeFBJ/GLoBU1nDQ glMl2dfBmpcXuXgK8yDYBTJc3Ly+yL8mwxke+9dDGHipf+K/Pjp+dVv0jSpMfa567Og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OngGMp1s; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBD0606A31A; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 23:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OngGMp1s Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68E031F01825; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 23:23:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793229787; bh=siS9tKJrzzyUZocyxRqmx7YU4OiiuwHiHfyCYQ99NZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=OngGMp1syV4MyuQfzYiRvEL+Z9vkJbHzykEVyJdKqq1L+QaQqUxZsRFDKJvj3bH8f C7BIZBnO15XcJvEa1hQMLyK3uXjVUyvsmzGeWlEWu/GPVwlJ2U133p93Df/CP1qfXw nUyQNEeMJxO5K9nE/wcAK5pNFRpJ0sQuInXp+bLotSVNFnQfdEbZDGsYbLjSBFIXic +ZiMlWhMhy0isOq7HrFIpmawxeS2Q5tkKCvmkomw6RaPtoaDA4KeSM09XfTi0ceOq0 67UVv5KY6pLwiVtvbeNR+6lVk7Y5mhAfSQIFkwGvuZiyQjDNHTbjlFBpirxvD4+kOb los8PE9hdRM4g== Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:23:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Yang Cc: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: dsa: motorcomm: Isolate all ports during chip setup Message-ID: <20261028162306.60befefa@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20261026230300.1108190-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> <179305591469.3327.15926756079213213876@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 15:58:39 +0800 David Yang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 7:05=E2=80=AFAM wro= te: > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > > > - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during > > development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static > > analysis tool scan. > > > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. > > > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > > then. > > > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > > that is the case please reply and explain. =20 >=20 > HW Tested. Whether it was tested is the only one of the 3 questions which the bot did not ask you about. And if it did ask you you should name the platform. --=20 pw-bot: cr