All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: ioam6: makes IOAM insertion transparent to IPv6 ECMP
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:58:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028165812.1b40d1d4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auGryXdPv2mx0qlp@fedora>

On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:01:13 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 01:45:28PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > This series makes IOAM insertion transparent to IPv6 ECMP, as required
> > by RFC 9486 (C2): a packet carrying IOAM options must be forwarded
> > along the same path as the identical packet without them.  
> 
> Sorry, forgot to add target repo "net". I will add it in next version.

CI bot says:

The new selftest added alongside this series (tools/testing/selftests/net/ioam6_ecmp.sh)
is failing in our CI on the "Transit input ECMP with/without IOAM" scenario:

  TEST: Transit input ECMP with/without IOAM (diverged on seed 1: without IOAM via
        link A, with IOAM via link B)   [FAIL]
  TEST: Transit input ECMP with/without IOAM (seed 2..12)                [ OK ]
  TEST: Encapsulating node re-lookup ECMP with/without IOAM (seed 1..12) [ OK ]

11 of the 12 "transit input" seeds pass, and the whole "encapsulating node re-lookup"
scenario passes on all seeds, so this looks like an edge case in the Hop-by-Hop
nexthdr-recovery logic used for the policy-0 multipath hash, rather than a test
infra/flake issue. Could you take a look at whether the recovered "virtual" nexthdr
(or the padding/option-length walk used to compute it) is correct for all IOAM option
layouts/trace sizes, since one specific packet still ends up hashed to a different ECMP
sibling than the equivalent packet without IOAM?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  5:45 [PATCH 0/3] net: ioam6: makes IOAM insertion transparent to IPv6 ECMP Hangbin Liu
2026-10-28  5:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] ipv6: route: consider IOAM options in ECMP hash policy 0 Hangbin Liu
2026-10-28  5:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] ipv6: ioam6: use transformed packet nexthdr for ECMP re-lookup Hangbin Liu
2026-10-28  5:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: net: add ioam6 ECMP test (RFC 9486 C2) Hangbin Liu
2026-10-28  8:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: ioam6: makes IOAM insertion transparent to IPv6 ECMP Hangbin Liu
2026-10-28 23:58   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-10-29  0:38     ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-29  9:02     ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261028165812.1b40d1d4@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=justin.iurman@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.