From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793212079; b=gxZxGcbGi6FE1nK/RdZxhk7wxIdfiVPS/+KpJ2owsjt1xxyLVvMwyOhpN892zC/duXaW qkNA8IcjX/BGIXEL7//ZOzFKhyaKZOdBxSDm0uSoAQekY0QGNX0bxL2B51uPoQVu3W8PZ FjQvBgPwmAs++cep/i147L9mYxVzwmZRJCLJLAgfjlC2pyhKVpIxuaT7NsUUYG+91/RoZ zVFCXrjRhp6RhimhYpOeRxsVogxbrtpNuGGCmGIwYJG2fByPjGLoH2JIJuzcQMyWjVw1/ B4WmCfUoCZIivMtvvj6Dc4WNQp88ootk4QAknA0BMsv1pkDOp5LzYBBUHP48BQc2LtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793212079; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:User-Agent:X-stable:X-Patchwork-Hint: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=jsBQBxIXKetYNJ9yUmt05g4+TgV/h6WBBjH9/rBCguQ=; b=srsSso8pnfk4JM0zX36JvMqQBWQkXk6SZBKCryQmGbX2cYFzfVJf8O7PTyVpmXQMnfBL JqcjFZEXcv/pIOhxcewNPjn/LXfqLwcRoK1AjWwLBzOv2U8nZDWwemFa2yaMIDqZ2CP5l p9uWftsZ5Dj69NA3u4IJctPaTtY9Uovu2OIxEg1seGpqBR7M6H783aKPrUjIM/QzDX/1E eML3Vjaty4rtNLX8DKqOQxoeBKDvOKAo52QiLcBTx8rSHHOtoO0j2jJ5VnZhwdhImWNWG ql8YSH1imor9X19lFPtjIbqaaJtkyms+SegNN0893IViS/FotB4L87C1YLgBPezi2zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=R2PVNuKU; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBCB606A31E; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=R2PVNuKU Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10A081F01825; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1793212078; bh=jsBQBxIXKetYNJ9yUmt05g4+TgV/h6WBBjH9/rBCguQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=R2PVNuKUuuq3Au4/EVhTebsZlPWnmy0PJ06lSOilmh18vPThDkhV14xXZZnCkpNY4 4XVa+X2yGCuhoOIFLf3+lP1FyCPFZ3a3TELOgLYHcPY3ULAO85cVtBFQgsb/akgRiM UsuC3wK+VTrKU+1N/YbYRo1ZNZr60IpAAcX4RF5o= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Doruk Tan Ozturk , Joseph Qi , Joel Becker , Kees Cook , Mark Fasheh , Junxiao Bi , Changwei Ge , Jun Piao , Heming Zhao , Andrew Morton , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 0031/1887] ocfs2: validate directory-index entry counts when reading metadata Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 17:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20261028170459.935548252@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.56.0 In-Reply-To: <20261028170459.200466217@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20261028170459.200466217@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Doruk Tan Ozturk [ Upstream commit bc70726ddad53c7e9a9a85915bf2415b0d4f42f9 ] ocfs2_validate_dx_leaf() and ocfs2_validate_dx_root() check the ECC and signature of an indexed-directory block before it reaches higher-level callers, but neither validator bounds the ocfs2_dx_entry_list counts against the capacity of the block that holds them. ocfs2_dx_dir_search() then walks for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(entry_list->de_num_used); i++) dx_entry = &entry_list->de_entries[i]; over de_num_used entries with no bounds check. entry_list is either dx_leaf->dl_list (from ocfs2_read_dx_leaf) or, for an inline root, dx_root->dr_entries. A crafted on-disk image can set de_num_used (and de_count, which is the __counted_by_le() bound of de_entries) to 0xffff and make the walk read far past the end of the 4KB metadata block, giving a slab out-of-bounds read reachable from any path lookup, stat() or open() on an indexed directory once the image is mounted. Commit 775c17386a6f ("ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read") already bounds dr_list for the non-inline dx_root, but left the inline dr_entries path and the dx_leaf dl_list unchecked. Add the same read-time validation for both entry lists: de_count must equal the capacity of the block (ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf()/per_root()) and de_num_used must not exceed de_count, rejecting corrupted metadata with -EFSCORRUPTED before ocfs2_dx_dir_search() can walk an out-of-range entry array. de_count is always written as exactly the block capacity when a leaf or inline root is formatted, so the equality check does not reject any valid image. Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260713205625.92391-1-doruk@0sec.ai Fixes: 9b7895efac90 ("ocfs2: Add a name indexed b-tree to directory inodes") Fixes: 4ed8a6bb083b ("ocfs2: Store dir index records inline") Assisted-by: 0sec:claude-opus-4-8 Signed-off-by: Doruk Tan Ozturk Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Jun Piao Cc: Heming Zhao Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c index b758f11738c65..bb3a67b9edff0 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c @@ -611,6 +611,28 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb, le16_to_cpu(el->l_count)); goto bail; } + } else { + struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *dl_list = &dx_root->dr_entries; + + if (le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count) != + ocfs2_dx_entries_per_root(sb)) { + ret = ocfs2_error(sb, + "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid de_count %u (expected %u)\n", + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno), + le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count), + ocfs2_dx_entries_per_root(sb)); + goto bail; + } + + if (le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_num_used) > + le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count)) { + ret = ocfs2_error(sb, + "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid de_num_used %u (de_count %u)\n", + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno), + le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_num_used), + le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count)); + goto bail; + } } bail: @@ -650,10 +672,25 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_leaf(struct super_block *sb, return ret; } - if (!OCFS2_IS_VALID_DX_LEAF(dx_leaf)) { - ret = ocfs2_error(sb, "Dir Index Leaf has bad signature %.*s\n", - 7, dx_leaf->dl_signature); - } + if (!OCFS2_IS_VALID_DX_LEAF(dx_leaf)) + return ocfs2_error(sb, "Dir Index Leaf has bad signature %.*s\n", + 7, dx_leaf->dl_signature); + + if (le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count) != + ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf(sb)) + return ocfs2_error(sb, + "Dir Index Leaf # %llu has invalid de_count %u (expected %u)\n", + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_blkno), + le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count), + ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf(sb)); + + if (le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_num_used) > + le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count)) + return ocfs2_error(sb, + "Dir Index Leaf # %llu has invalid de_num_used %u (de_count %u)\n", + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_blkno), + le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_num_used), + le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count)); return ret; } -- 2.53.0