From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] memcg: Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE() under memcg_stock.lock.
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:50:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028185034.3607746-2-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028185034.3607746-1-kuniyu@google.com>
this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock) is always modified under
local_lock(&memcg_stock.lock).
Unlike is_memcg_drain_needed() under RCU, consume_stock(),
drain_stock(), and refill_stock() do not need READ_ONCE().
Especially, in refill_stock(), READ_ONCE() is used twice for
stock->cached[i], which forces the compiler to emit two volatile
loads from stock->cached[i].
Let's remove the unnecessary READ_ONCE() and eliminate the
redundant loads in refill_stock():
Before:
cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
4c 8b 80 88 d7 bd 84 movq -0x7b422878(%rax), %r8
if (memcg == READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i])) {
48 3b 98 88 d7 bd 84 cmpq -0x7b422878(%rax), %rbx
0f 84 86 01 00 00 je 0xffffffff817d01e0 <refill_stock+0x210>
After:
cached = stock->cached[i];
4c 8b 88 88 d7 bd 84 movq -0x7b422878(%rax), %r9
if (memcg == stock->cached[i]) {
4c 39 cb cmpq %r9, %rbx
0f 84 7a 01 00 00 je 0xffffffff817d01d0 <refill_stock+0x200>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 84f4a8fd4d16..8a401550dfaa 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2164,10 +2164,10 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMCG_STOCK; ++i) {
- if (memcg != READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]))
+ if (memcg != stock->cached[i])
continue;
- stock_pages = READ_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i]);
+ stock_pages = stock->nr_pages[i];
if (stock_pages >= nr_pages) {
stock_pages -= nr_pages;
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], stock_pages);
@@ -2197,13 +2197,13 @@ static void memcg_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
*/
static void drain_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock, int i)
{
- struct mem_cgroup *old = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
+ struct mem_cgroup *old = stock->cached[i];
uint8_t stock_pages;
if (!old)
return;
- stock_pages = READ_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i]);
+ stock_pages = stock->nr_pages[i];
if (stock_pages) {
memcg_uncharge(old, stock_pages);
WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], 0);
@@ -2284,11 +2284,11 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMCG_STOCK; ++i) {
- cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
+ cached = stock->cached[i];
if (!cached && empty_slot == -1)
empty_slot = i;
- if (memcg == READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i])) {
- stock_pages = READ_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i]) + nr_pages;
+ if (memcg == stock->cached[i]) {
+ stock_pages = stock->nr_pages[i] + nr_pages;
if (stock_pages > MEMCG_STOCK_HIGH) {
memcg_uncharge(memcg,
stock_pages - MEMCG_STOCK_LOW);
--
2.56.0.313.g2479322e68-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 18:50 [PATCH v2 0/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-10-29 0:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] memcg: Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE() under memcg_stock.lock Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] memcg: Reduce nesting in consume_stock() and refill_stock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] memcg: Annotate slow paths " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:49 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] memcg: Uncharge pages outside memcg_stock.lock in __refill_stock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: cgroup: Deflake test_memcg_sock() in test_memcontrol.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] memcg: Batch mod_memcg_state() for MEMCG_SOCK Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 0:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-29 1:35 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-29 2:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028185034.3607746-2-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.