From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Ding Hui <dinghui1111@163.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"open list:STMMAC ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dinghui@lixiang.com, xiasanbo@lixiang.com,
yangchen11@lixiang.com, liuxuanjun@lixiang.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:40:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029084040.24c85866@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fdea60e-abe8-4ecc-bce2-672f4e3d6b47@redhat.com>
On Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:24:17 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The merge window for Linux v7.4 has begun, and the net-next
> tree is now closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring
> and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
But these are sort-of-fixes right? Aren't these okay to merge during
the merge window? AI bots will keep reporting the pre-existing issues
on net patches if we merge this to net-next. Dunno.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 7:13 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] net: stmmac: guard against NULL pointers when freeing TX/RX buffers Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: stmmac: clean up partially allocated DMA rings on error Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: stmmac: release descriptor resources through priv->dma_conf on open failure Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] net: stmmac: hold RTNL when reading descriptor rings in descriptors_status Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-29 10:24 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-29 15:40 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029084040.24c85866@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinghui1111@163.com \
--cc=dinghui@lixiang.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=liuxuanjun@lixiang.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiasanbo@lixiang.com \
--cc=yangchen11@lixiang.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.