All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuqiang Sun <izaiahsun@gmail.com>
To: andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: core: Do not put the device when device_add() fails
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 21:00:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029130037.5505-1-izaiahsun@gmail.com> (raw)

When device_add() fails, rproc_add() calls put_device() and then
removes the character device.  The reference it drops is the one
rproc_alloc() took with device_initialize(), which belongs to the
caller: after a failed rproc_add(), every driver frees the rproc,
either with rproc_free() or through devm_rproc_alloc(), and both drop
that reference again.

So the rproc is freed inside rproc_add(): by the put_device() itself,
or, with CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_CDEV, by the cdev_del() that follows, when
the character device drops its reference on the parent device.  The
caller then uses the freed rproc and puts it a second time.

With one allocation failure injected into device_add() (failslab
restricted to rproc_add) while st_fdma probes, KASAN reports:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in slim_clk_disable+0x38/0xf4 [st_slim_rproc]
  Read of size 8 by task insmod/69
  Call trace:
   slim_clk_disable
   st_slim_rproc_alloc
   st_fdma_probe
  Freed by task 69:
   kfree
   rproc_type_release
   device_release
   kobject_put
   cdev_default_release
   kobject_put
   cdev_del
   rproc_char_device_remove
   rproc_add
   st_slim_rproc_alloc

followed by use-after-free reports in kobject_put() and
refcount_warn_saturate() from the rproc_free() in
st_slim_rproc_alloc().

Remove the put_device(): the caller's rproc_free() drops the reference
and releases the rproc, as it does for the other failures in
rproc_add().

The problem was found with kbound, a static analysis prototype that
checks whether callers rely on an object after a callee returns a value
for which the callee may have released it, on v7.2.12; it is present
in rproc-next.

Build-tested with x86_64 and arm64 allmodconfig (W=1, sparse): no new
warnings.  Run-tested on QEMU's arm64 virt machine (TCG) with KASAN,
using a device tree node for an ST FDMA with a SLIM core, so that
st_fdma_probe() reaches rproc_add() without the hardware (no clocks,
MMIO windows only mapped), and failing each allocation in rproc_add()
in turn with failslab: before this patch every failure in device_add()
(9 of 9) gives the reports above; with it nothing is reported, and the
rproc is released once, by rproc_free().  Not tested on remoteproc
hardware.

Fixes: 7dbdb8bd7c02 ("remoteproc: core: Cleanup device in case of failure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 kbound
Signed-off-by: Yuqiang Sun <izaiahsun@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b88bf179507d..e4f44a3c8b4d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2309,10 +2309,8 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = device_add(dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		put_device(dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto rproc_remove_cdev;
-	}
 
 	dev_info(dev, "%s is available\n", rproc->name);
 

base-commit: 82d0bbd67c42a44f0e18b0b7b0da0f3ace0c9527
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 13:00 Yuqiang Sun [this message]
2026-11-03 16:28 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: core: Do not put the device when device_add() fails Mathieu Poirier
2026-11-03 17:47   ` Yuqiang Sun
2026-11-04 16:34     ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-11-04 16:39       ` Yuqiang Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261029130037.5505-1-izaiahsun@gmail.com \
    --to=izaiahsun@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.