From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Yingjie Wang <x-professor@outlook.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@kernel.org" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"phx0fer@gmail.com" <phx0fer@gmail.com>,
"wang.zhan@smartx.com" <wang.zhan@smartx.com>,
"kuniyu@google.com" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: preserve rps_default_mask on failed writes
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 16:00:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030160029.76ee6c7f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11f9052cba649eb1efec6e9e45eb9377d46e19d1.1793286626.git.x-professor@outlook.com>
On Thu, 29 Oct 2026 15:10:36 +0000 Yingjie Wang wrote:
> rps_default_mask_sysctl() passes the live per-netns mask to
> cpumask_parse(). bitmap_parse() stores chunks as it scans from right to
> left, so a later error can leave lower chunks changed.
> rps_cpumask_housekeeping() also intersects its input in place before
> returning -EINVAL when no housekeeping CPUs remain.
>
> Consequently, a failed write changes both the value read from the sysctl
> and the default copied to RX queues created later. On a four-CPU VM,
> after setting the mask to 1, writing zz,00000003 failed with EOVERFLOW
> but changed the mask to 3. Writing a mask containing only isolated CPUs
> failed with EINVAL but changed it to 0. No kernel modification or error
> injection was needed to reproduce either case.
>
> Parse and validate a temporary mask before taking the mutex. After both
> steps succeed, take the mutex and replace the live pointer. Readers
> access and consume the pointer while holding the same mutex, so the
> replaced mask can be freed after dropping the mutex.
>
> The rps_default_mask selftest failed on the base kernel and passed with
> the fix. The fixed kernel also kept the mask at 1 for the overflow and
> housekeeping failure cases, while valid writes of 2 and 0 still
> succeeded.
>
> The issue was found while fuzzing sysctl write error paths.
>
> Fixes: 605cfa1b1090 ("net: introduce default_rps_mask netns attribute")
> Reviewed-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
> Tested-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yingjie Wang <x-professor@outlook.com>
kzalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL) failure seems purely theoretical.
Please drop the Fixes tag and drop the selftest, and repost after the
merge window is over (https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/net-next.html)
> diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> index 473c162736d69..f25281c709346 100644
> --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> @@ -105,34 +105,37 @@ static int rps_default_mask_sysctl(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> struct net *net = (struct net *)table->data;
> + struct cpumask *new_mask = NULL;
> struct cpumask *mask;
> int err = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&rps_default_mask_mutex);
> - mask = net->core.rps_default_mask;
> if (write) {
> - if (!mask) {
> - mask = kzalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
> - net->core.rps_default_mask = mask;
> - }
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - if (!mask)
> - goto done;
> + new_mask = kzalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_mask)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - err = cpumask_parse(buffer, mask);
> + err = cpumask_parse(buffer, new_mask);
> if (err)
> - goto done;
> + goto out;
>
> - err = rps_cpumask_housekeeping(mask);
> + err = rps_cpumask_housekeeping(new_mask);
> if (err)
> - goto done;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rps_default_mask_mutex);
> + mask = net->core.rps_default_mask;
> + if (write) {
> + net->core.rps_default_mask = new_mask;
> + new_mask = mask;
nit: this could use
swap(net->core.rps_default_mask, new_mask);
> } else {
> err = dump_cpumask(buffer, lenp, ppos,
> mask ?: cpu_none_mask);
> }
>
> -done:
> mutex_unlock(&rps_default_mask_mutex);
> +out:
> + kfree(new_mask);
> return err;
> }
>
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 15:10 [PATCH net v2 0/2] net: preserve rps_default_mask on failed writes Yingjie Wang
2026-10-29 15:10 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] " Yingjie Wang
2026-10-30 23:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-10-29 15:10 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: net: check failed rps_default_mask writes Yingjie Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261030160029.76ee6c7f@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phx0fer@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
--cc=x-professor@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.