From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutn?" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 19:41:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101114206.2434398-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101114206.2434398-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Refactor validate_partition() to take the parent partition, the new
partition root state, the new effective exclusive CPUs and the CPUs to
be deleted, instead of a trial cpuset. A NULL parent stands for a
remote partition, whose CPUs come from top_cpuset. This makes the
interface flexible enough to handle both local and remote partition
validation.
The housekeeping conflict check is folded into validate_partition(). It
is skipped when the parent is not a valid partition root, as @cs can't
be a valid local partition in that case.
Use the new interface for local partition enablement in
update_parent_effective_cpumask() and in partition_cpus_change(),
replacing the open-coded checks there. The order of the checks is now
the same for both paths: empty CPUs, housekeeping conflict, then no CPU
left for tasks.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index df9fc126e391..df52f6e5e99f 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1438,6 +1438,41 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int new_prs, int parent_prs,
return res;
}
+/**
+ * validate_partition - Validate a cpuset partition configuration
+ * @cs: The cpuset to validate
+ * @parent: Parent partition of @cs, NULL for remote partition
+ * @new_prs: The proposed new partition root state
+ * @new_excpus: The new effective exclusive CPUs mask to validate
+ * @del: exclusive CPUs to be deleted from @cs, can be NULL
+ *
+ * The housekeeping check is skipped if @parent is not a valid partition
+ * root as @cs can't be a valid local partition in that case.
+ *
+ * Return: PRS error code (0 if valid, non-zero error code if invalid)
+ */
+static enum prs_errcode validate_partition(struct cpuset *cs,
+ struct cpuset *parent, int new_prs,
+ struct cpumask *new_excpus, struct cpumask *del)
+{
+ int parent_prs = parent ? parent->partition_root_state : PRS_ROOT;
+
+ if (new_prs == PRS_MEMBER)
+ return PERR_NONE;
+
+ if (cpumask_empty(new_excpus))
+ return PERR_INVCPUS;
+
+ if ((parent_prs > 0) &&
+ prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, new_excpus, del))
+ return PERR_HKEEPING;
+
+ if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent_cs(cs), cs, new_excpus))
+ return PERR_NOCPUS;
+
+ return PERR_NONE;
+}
+
/*
* cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock - Rebuild sched domains, update HK & unlock
*
@@ -1955,18 +1990,10 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
if ((cmd == partcmd_enable) || (cmd == partcmd_enablei)) {
new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
- /*
- * Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
- * effective_xcpus is empty.
- */
- if (cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask))
- return PERR_INVCPUS;
-
- if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, tmp->delmask, NULL))
- return PERR_HKEEPING;
-
- if (nocpu)
- return PERR_NOCPUS;
+ part_error = validate_partition(cs, parent, new_prs,
+ tmp->delmask, NULL);
+ if (part_error)
+ return part_error;
/*
* This function will only be called when all the preliminary
@@ -2432,32 +2459,6 @@ static int parse_cpuset_cpulist(const char *buf, struct cpumask *out_mask)
return 0;
}
-/**
- * validate_partition - Validate a cpuset partition configuration
- * @cs: The cpuset to validate
- * @trialcs: The trial cpuset containing proposed configuration changes
- *
- * If any validation check fails, the appropriate error code is set in the
- * cpuset's prs_err field.
- *
- * Return: PRS error code (0 if valid, non-zero error code if invalid)
- */
-static enum prs_errcode validate_partition(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs)
-{
- struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
-
- if (cs_is_member(trialcs))
- return PERR_NONE;
-
- if (cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus))
- return PERR_INVCPUS;
-
- if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, trialcs->effective_xcpus))
- return PERR_NOCPUS;
-
- return PERR_NONE;
-}
-
/**
* partition_cpus_change - Handle partition state changes due to CPU mask updates
* @cs: The target cpuset being modified
@@ -2471,33 +2472,24 @@ static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
enum prs_errcode prs_err;
- int parent_prs = is_remote_partition(cs)
- ? PRS_ROOT : parent_cs(cs)->partition_root_state;
+ struct cpuset *parent = is_remote_partition(cs) ? NULL : parent_cs(cs);
if (cs_is_member(cs))
return;
- prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
- if (!prs_err && (parent_prs > 0) &&
- !cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
- int prs = cs->partition_root_state;
-
- /*
- * Check for housekeeping conflict by passing the whole
- * effective_xcpus as well as those CPUs that are to be
- * removed from cs as delmask.
- */
- if (prs > 0)
- cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus);
- else
- cpumask_clear(tmp->delmask);
-
- if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(prs, parent_prs,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask))
- prs_err = PERR_HKEEPING;
- }
+ /*
+ * Check for housekeeping conflict by passing the whole
+ * effective_xcpus as well as those CPUs that are to be
+ * removed from cs as delmask.
+ */
+ if (is_partition_valid(cs))
+ cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
+ trialcs->effective_xcpus);
+ else
+ cpumask_clear(tmp->delmask);
+ prs_err = validate_partition(cs, parent, trialcs->partition_root_state,
+ trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask);
if (prs_err) {
WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, prs_err);
trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 11:41 [RFC PATCH -v4 00/22] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 01/22] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 02/22] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 04/22] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 05/22] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 06/22] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 07/22] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 08/22] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 09/22] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 10/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 11/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 12/22] cpuset: use local_partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 13/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 14/22] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 15/22] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 16/22] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 17/22] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 18/22] cpuset: use validate_local_partition in local_partition_enable Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 19/22] cpuset: introduce validate_remote_partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 20/22] cpuset: simplify the update_prstate() function Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 21/22] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 22/22] cpuset: remove unnecessary validation in partition_cpus_change Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261101114206.2434398-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.