From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D739D606A326 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=J5R17G6w; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Z+haQ7pj; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=lAnEucT9; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=9YksP3+c Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9353CDC7B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:50:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6E73CDC7B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:50:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BEE1400DEF for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:50:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD2421F0A; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:50:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1793875826; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Snn4s0IobpXdhiBMqtnNc1v1NAql5onZQAbe+sblHGg=; b=J5R17G6wMJ/kp+eXKx+rtUAhtP+Hff6lD8z/MN5HgNw3HQPN9hyVk5I6fgjV9Lt6zue1w1 C78LYgp2uPSwqYLF6I0QZdbT/nUpHDe8LghQWhUQ5KiiBTv5npfA3iinfn5u90atFvjdBQ a+SGoUAgTUud+Oczq9r6gA0ikk6FGZM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1793875826; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Snn4s0IobpXdhiBMqtnNc1v1NAql5onZQAbe+sblHGg=; b=Z+haQ7pjSplLNKn+ol/9ddbqr55z/oBpI1BNKmDzkYsuXgtONpl2xN1NhSzO30kG3bxokI 2oqO9V20mCcXSQCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=lAnEucT9; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=9YksP3+c DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1793875825; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Snn4s0IobpXdhiBMqtnNc1v1NAql5onZQAbe+sblHGg=; b=lAnEucT9b1OTCTYi7MqK8rsEBHQWN/ZVfHZbEAZisQasFBRcWHm3ftIoaJzFxZ1KozQ97w tLiFhI2d+fqemUBoDeaIo4+zZ6482VDS1+EvhKn0EP4tyHWG0+FX+xoGiXPKCznb5Ebxc6 iKMfN6xO/F4REBTXk4OjhRHvLmtoNPw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1793875825; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Snn4s0IobpXdhiBMqtnNc1v1NAql5onZQAbe+sblHGg=; b=9YksP3+cvONTJc+HvgmEwfQivjjnft/r4HMUimOhShPIxRFO1zvB645VP0dZ3O6ua+porq MKGNAgPVvIvu52Bg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF630133F6; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 8wHyI3Bf7Gr8PwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 05 Nov 2026 10:50:24 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:50:23 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20261105105023.GA459386@pevik> References: <20261020190151.9420-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-11.21 / 50.00]; SUSE_INTERNAL_BYPASS(-9.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email,suse.cz:replyto,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,lists.linux.it,suse.cz,linux.dev,suse.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Score: -11.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2DD2421F0A X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] cve: add pwnescape reproducer X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Martin Doucha , ltp@lists.linux.it, linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, all, I'm verifying it at least on some of SLES versions. FYI on 4.12 and 4.4 based SLES kernels with backported 6785011f8b16 (i.e. fixed kernels) the test fails: pwnescape.c:213: TBROK: control datagram was not forwarded back => obviously test is not working on older codestreams, that would be good to get fixed. I try to have look on it, but I'm not sure if I manage it till the end of the month. Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > Hi Andrea, > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2026, Andrea Cervesato wrote: > > > cve: add pwnescape reproducer > > > + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) { > > > + {"linux-git", "6785011f8b16"}, > > > + {} > > > + }, > > Add {"CVE", "2026-99999"} to .tags in testcases/cve/pwnescape.c. > > Without it, metadata extraction assigns only the regression group, so > > CVE-based metadata selection and the generated CVE catalog omit this test; > > the runtest/cve entry does not populate that metadata. > Valid, I will fix it before merge Sure, I can add it before merge. > > Runtime verification was blocked by unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) returning > > EPERM in this environment, before the forwarding behavior was exercised. > This is the github LSM pushing out the reproducer. It's not a test bug Sure. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp