All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y] xfs: allow softlimit with no hardlimit in quota scrub
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 2026 10:36:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105153535.1859622-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026110443-mobile-krypton-9fb6@gregkh>

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 342c2e00b3a99099a7088f7b8c8f075670c603a9 ]

LOLLM observes that the sysadmin can set a user's soft limit to a
nonzero value and the hard limit to zero, so those aren't corruptions.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15
Fixes: c2fc338c87a31f ("xfs: scrub quota information")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LOLLM # finding obvious bugs
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
[ sashal: omitted the quota repair changes in xrep_quota_item() ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
index e34ca20ae8e40..42cccc6505f76 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
@@ -103,21 +103,21 @@ xchk_quota_item(
 	 * suspect, which is why we flag it for review.
 	 *
 	 * Complain about corruption if the soft limit is greater than
-	 * the hard limit.
+	 * the hard limit and there's a hard limit set.
 	 */
 	if (dq->q_blk.hardlimit > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
 		xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
-	if (dq->q_blk.softlimit > dq->q_blk.hardlimit)
+	if (dq->q_blk.hardlimit && dq->q_blk.softlimit > dq->q_blk.hardlimit)
 		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
 
 	if (dq->q_ino.hardlimit > M_IGEO(mp)->maxicount)
 		xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
-	if (dq->q_ino.softlimit > dq->q_ino.hardlimit)
+	if (dq->q_ino.hardlimit && dq->q_ino.softlimit > dq->q_ino.hardlimit)
 		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
 
 	if (dq->q_rtb.hardlimit > mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks)
 		xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
-	if (dq->q_rtb.softlimit > dq->q_rtb.hardlimit)
+	if (dq->q_rtb.hardlimit && dq->q_rtb.softlimit > dq->q_rtb.hardlimit)
 		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
 
 	/* Check the resource counts. */
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 15:15 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: allow softlimit with no hardlimit in quota scrub" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-11-05 15:36 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261105153535.1859622-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.