All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y 2/2] xfs: improve dirent bounds checking in scrub and repair
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 2026 11:23:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105162325.2112487-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105162325.2112487-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5d470234d04dae6fe2ca2cf4b9ef277b78c7e05a ]

LOLLM complains that we don't do enough bounds checking of the directory
entries in directory blocks when we're looking for errors or trying to
salvage entries.  Let's improve that with more detailed checks.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16
Fixes: ce92d29ddf9908 ("xfs: directory scrubber must walk through data block to offset")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LOLLM # finding obvious bugs
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c        | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 fs/xfs/scrub/dir_repair.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c
index 2f73baee0f0b4..495fdf3b519ae 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dir.c
@@ -323,11 +323,24 @@ xchk_dir_check_unused(
 	struct xchk_da_btree		*ds,
 	struct xfs_buf			*bp,
 	unsigned int			iter_off,
-	unsigned int			end)
+	unsigned int			end,
+	xfs_dablk_t			rec_bno)
 {
 	struct xfs_dir2_data_unused	*dup = bp->b_addr + iter_off;
+	unsigned int			advance;
+
+	if (iter_off + sizeof(*dup) > end) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	advance = xfs_dir2_data_unusedsize(be16_to_cpu(dup->length));
+	if (!advance || iter_off + advance > end) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		return -1;
+	}
 
-	return be16_to_cpu(dup->length);
+	return advance;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -341,15 +354,31 @@ xchk_dir_check_entry(
 	struct xfs_buf			*bp,
 	unsigned int			iter_off,
 	unsigned int			end,
-	struct xfs_dir2_data_entry	*dent)
+	struct xfs_dir2_data_entry	*dent,
+	xfs_dablk_t			rec_bno)
 {
 	struct xfs_dir2_data_entry	*dep = bp->b_addr + iter_off;
 	struct xfs_mount		*mp = ds->state->mp;
+	unsigned int			advance;
+
+	/* must have namelen */
+	advance = offsetof(typeof(*dep), name);
+	if (iter_off + advance >= end) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	/* Don't walk off the end of the block. */
+	advance = xfs_dir2_data_entsize(mp, dep->namelen);
+	if (!advance || iter_off + advance > end) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		return -1;
+	}
 
 	if (dep == dent)
 		return 0;
 
-	return xfs_dir2_data_entsize(mp, dep->namelen);
+	return advance;
 }
 
 /* Scrub a directory btree record. */
@@ -377,6 +406,7 @@ xchk_dir_rec(
 	xfs_dahash_t			hash;
 	struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr	hdr;
 	unsigned int			tag;
+	bool				foundit = false;
 	int				error;
 
 	ASSERT(blk->magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC ||
@@ -421,33 +451,44 @@ xchk_dir_rec(
 	dent = bp->b_addr + off;
 
 	/* Make sure we got a real directory entry. */
-	iter_off = geo->data_entry_offset;
 	end = xfs_dir3_data_end_offset(geo, bp->b_addr);
 	if (!end) {
 		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
 		goto out_relse;
 	}
-	for (;;) {
+	iter_off = geo->data_entry_offset;
+	while (iter_off < end) {
 		struct xfs_dir2_data_unused	*dup = bp->b_addr + iter_off;
 		int				advance;
 
-		if (iter_off >= end) {
+		/* must have freetag */
+		advance = offsetof(typeof(*dup), length);
+		if (iter_off + advance >= end) {
 			xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
 			goto out_relse;
 		}
 
 		if (dup->freetag == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_DATA_FREE_TAG))
-			advance = xchk_dir_check_unused(ds, bp, iter_off, end);
+			advance = xchk_dir_check_unused(ds, bp, iter_off, end,
+					rec_bno);
 		else
 			advance = xchk_dir_check_entry(ds, bp, iter_off, end,
-					dent);
+					dent, rec_bno);
 		if (advance < 0)
 			goto out_relse;
-		if (!advance)
+		if (!advance) {
+			foundit = true;
 			break;
+		}
 		iter_off += advance;
 	}
 
+	/* Hash tree must point to the exact dirent */
+	if (!foundit) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		goto out_relse;
+	}
+
 	/* Retrieve the entry, sanity check it, and compare hashes. */
 	ino = be64_to_cpu(dent->inumber);
 	hash = be32_to_cpu(ent->hashval);
@@ -459,6 +500,13 @@ xchk_dir_rec(
 		goto out_relse;
 	}
 
+	/* Name must not overflow end of block */
+	if ((char *)dent->name + dent->namelen >
+	    (char *)bp->b_addr + BBTOB(bp->b_length)) {
+		xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(ds->sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, rec_bno);
+		goto out_relse;
+	}
+
 	/* Does the directory hash match? */
 	dname.name = dent->name;
 	dname.len = dent->namelen;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/dir_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/dir_repair.c
index f8e88b638c43d..c7fd39fd83a48 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dir_repair.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dir_repair.c
@@ -473,8 +473,16 @@ xrep_dir_recover_unused(
 	unsigned int			end)
 {
 	struct xfs_dir2_data_unused	*dup = bp->b_addr + offset;
+	unsigned int			advance;
+
+	if (offset + sizeof(*dup) > end)
+		return 0;
+
+	advance = xfs_dir2_data_unusedsize(be16_to_cpu(dup->length));
+	if (!advance || offset + advance > end)
+		return 0;
 
-	return be16_to_cpu(dup->length);
+	return advance;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -492,11 +500,14 @@ xrep_dir_recover_entry(
 	unsigned int			advance;
 	int				error;
 
+	/* must have namelen */
+	advance = offsetof(typeof(*dep), name);
+	if (offset + advance >= end)
+		return 0;
+
 	/* Don't walk off the end of the block. */
 	advance = xfs_dir2_data_entsize(rd->sc->mp, dep->namelen);
-	if (!advance)
-		return 0;
-	if (offset + advance > end)
+	if (!advance || offset + advance > end)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Ok, let's save this entry. */
@@ -534,6 +545,11 @@ xrep_dir_recover_data(
 		if (xchk_should_terminate(rd->sc, &error))
 			return error;
 
+		/* must have freetag */
+		advance = offsetof(typeof(*dup), length);
+		if (offset + advance >= end)
+			break;
+
 		if (dup->freetag == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_DATA_FREE_TAG))
 			advance = xrep_dir_recover_unused(bp, offset, end);
 		else
@@ -565,6 +581,19 @@ xrep_dir_recover_sf(
 	hdr = ifp->if_data;
 	end = (unsigned char *)ifp->if_data + ifp->if_bytes;
 
+	/* sf header must be big enough for count/i8count */
+	if (!hdr || ifp->if_bytes < 2)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* and large enough for the parent inumber */
+	if (hdr->i8count) {
+		if (ifp->if_bytes < offsetof(struct xfs_dir2_sf_hdr, parent[8]))
+			return 0;
+	} else {
+		if (ifp->if_bytes < offsetof(struct xfs_dir2_sf_hdr, parent[4]))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
 	ino = xfs_dir2_sf_get_parent_ino(hdr);
 	trace_xrep_dir_salvaged_parent(rd->sc->ip, ino);
 
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 17:51 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: improve dirent bounds checking in scrub and repair" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-11-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/2] xfs: refactor directory data block walking loops in scrub Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 16:23   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261105162325.2112487-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.