All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org,
	hch@lst.de, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] migrates ocfs2 DIO from buffer_head to iomap
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 11:46:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106104617.GA5746@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105071930.16399-1-heming.zhao@suse.com>

s/migrates/migrate/ I think.

On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 03:19:24PM +0800, Heming Zhao wrote:
> To simplify iomap development, we currently adopt the simplest approach:
> retaining the buffer_head style, where only one cluster is allocated
> per iomap_begin() call.

Do you mean you'd otherwise need changes to the core iomap code?
Or do I misunderstand the sentence.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05  7:19 [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] migrates ocfs2 DIO from buffer_head to iomap Heming Zhao
2026-11-05  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] ocfs2: Add new ocfs2_map_blocks() to introduce iomap feature Heming Zhao
2026-11-05  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/4] ocfs2: switch DIO read path from buffer_head to iomap Heming Zhao
2026-11-06 10:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-06 14:11     ` Heming Zhao
2026-11-05  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/4] ocfs2: switch dio write " Heming Zhao
2026-11-06 10:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-06 14:25     ` Heming Zhao
2026-11-05  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] ocfs2: remove legacy blockdev direct-IO path APIs Heming Zhao
2026-11-06 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-11-06 14:09   ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] migrates ocfs2 DIO from buffer_head to iomap Heming Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261106104617.GA5746@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.