From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: "Pengfei Lv" <lvpengfei20@huawei.com>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: hub: Re-guess ep0 maxpacket size on reset
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 23:01:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106230113.7d2b8eae.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-200650@kernel.org>
On Fri, 06 Nov 2026 03:34:55 +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can calling usb_ep0_reinit(udev) here before hub_enable_device() or
> hub_set_address() trigger an invalid Evaluate Context command when
> the xHCI slot has been new
Okay, I stand corrected. Omitting the "if (!initial)" check in this
patch would cause even more warnings about failed xHCI commands.
usb_ep0_reinit() after alloc_dev() or certain reset_device() cases,
but before enable_device() or address_device(), causes xhci-hcd to
attempt some pointless nonsense, a known issue never fixed because
things still work despite the warnings.
You can work around it by adding usb_ep0_reinit() calls before the
two get_bMaxPacketSize0() calls which need them; by that time enough
setup has been done that xhci-hcd works right.
I will also look into fixing the xHCI bug because it's already being
triggered by "old scheme" enumeration on full-speed devices and it's
just lame. If the patch won't be too scary maybe we could get it to
stable and then this code would work unchanged.
> Furthermore, if a previous attempt in xhci_setup_device() failed with
> COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR, it reallocates the slot via xhci_alloc_dev() and
> calls xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev(xhci, udev), which populates
> vdev->in_ctx (including setting slot_ctx->dev_info and initializing in_ctx
> ep0) while vdev->out_ctx remains zeroed. If hub_port_init() retries and calls
> usb_ep0_reinit(udev) before the next xhci_setup_device(),
> xhci_check_ep0_maxpacket() overwrites vdev->in_ctx ep0 from the zeroed
> vdev->out_ctx while leaving slot_ctx->dev_info non-zero:
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c:xhci_setup_device() {
> ...
> if (!slot_ctx->dev_info)
> xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev(xhci, udev);
> /* Otherwise, update the control endpoint ring enqueue pointer. */
> else
> xhci_copy_ep0_dequeue_into_input_ctx(xhci, udev);
> ...
> }
>
> Wouldn't xhci_setup_device() then skip xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev() and
> submit Address Device with a zeroed ep0 context (EP_TYPE == 0)?
And this here looks like another related bug which may cause real
functional failure if it can be triggered.
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 12:44 [PATCH] usb: core: hub: Re-guess ep0 maxpacket size on reset Pengfei Lv
2026-11-04 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 14:59 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-04 17:36 ` Michal Pecio
2026-11-05 5:06 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-05 12:30 ` Michal Pecio
2026-11-05 8:41 ` Pengfei Lv
2026-11-05 15:46 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-06 3:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Pengfei Lv
2026-11-06 3:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 22:01 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-11-06 7:17 ` Michal Pecio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106230113.7d2b8eae.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvpengfei20@huawei.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.