From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-extent-list-count-check.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 12:53:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109205316.AB65E1F0089F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: abstract the zero extent list count check
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-extent-list-count-check.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-extent-list-count-check.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: ocfs2: abstract the zero extent list count check
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 20:21:09 +0800
Fold the l_count == 0 test into a predicate, the first of the extent list
group guarded by ocfs2_dinode_has_extents().
No functional change intended.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261109122121.21473-20-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c~ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-extent-list-count-check
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
@@ -260,6 +260,11 @@ static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_refcount_wi
!di->i_refcount_loc;
}
+static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_zero_extent_count(struct ocfs2_dinode *di)
+{
+ return le16_to_cpu(di->id2.i_list.l_count) == 0;
+}
+
void ocfs2_set_inode_flags(struct inode *inode)
{
unsigned int flags = OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_attr;
@@ -1908,7 +1913,7 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct su
u16 count = le16_to_cpu(el->l_count);
u16 next_free = le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec);
- if (count == 0) {
+ if (ocfs2_dinode_has_zero_extent_count(di)) {
rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
"Invalid dinode %llu: extent list l_count is zero\n",
(unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com are
ocfs2-exempt-orphaned-dinodes-from-the-zero-nlink-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-nlink-or-mode-dinode-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-i_blkno-mismatch-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-ocfs2_valid_fl-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-fs_generation-mismatch-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-suballoc-slot-checks.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-suballoc-bit-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-orphaned-slot-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-dio-orphaned-slot-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-inline-data-dinode-guard-and-cluster-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-inline-data-id_count-bound-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-inline-data-i_size-bound-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-fast-symlink-dinode-guard-and-size-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-fast-symlink-nul-termination-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-chain-list-dinode-guard-and-count-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-chain-list-next-free-record-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-chain-list-bits-per-cluster-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-dinode-refcount-location-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-zero-extent-list-count-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-oversized-extent-list-count-check.patch
ocfs2-abstract-the-extent-list-next-free-record-check.patch
ocfs2-report-unrepairable-corruption-from-online-filecheck-fix.patch
ocfs2-check-dinode-nlink-and-mode-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-dinode-suballoc-slot-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-dinode-suballoc-bit-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-dinode-orphaned-slots-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-inline-data-dinodes-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-fast-symlink-dinodes-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-chain-list-dinodes-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-dinode-refcount-location-in-online-filecheck.patch
ocfs2-check-extent-list-dinodes-in-online-filecheck.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109205316.AB65E1F0089F@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.