From: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
To: mason@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, cem@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
tz2294@columbia.edu, brauner@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 01/11] xfs: don't skip the flush before shifting extents
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:04:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110190417.32650-3-mason@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110190417.32650-1-mason@kernel.org>
On an XFS file larger than 4 EiB, collapse range and insert range can
drop dirty data without writing it back, and then fail with
EFSCORRUPTED.
xfs_prepare_shift() flushes the page cache from its offset to EOF, but
passes i_size as the length. Above 4 EiB the end of that range can
overflow and turn negative. filemap_write_and_wait_range() then writes
nothing, but truncate_pagecache_range() takes the end as unsigned and
drops every folio from the start of the range onward.
A delalloc extent under a dropped folio stays in the data fork, and the
shift returns -EFSCORRUPTED for it.
The fix used here is to pass i_size - offset as the length.
Fixes: 7f9f71be84bc ("xfs: extent shifting doesn't fully invalidate page cache")
Fixes: feeb9b269523 ("filemap: skip write and wait if end offset precedes start")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
Notes:
v6->v7:
- No change.
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 865aec3ae5ab..537c6b29417c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ xfs_prepare_shift(
* Writeback and invalidate cache for the remainder of the file as we're
* about to shift down every extent from offset to EOF.
*/
- error = xfs_flush_unmap_range(ip, offset, XFS_ISIZE(ip));
+ error = xfs_flush_unmap_range(ip, offset, XFS_ISIZE(ip) - offset);
if (error)
return error;
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 19:04 [PATCH v7 00/11] reflink and atomic write bugs Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:04 ` Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:04 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2026-11-10 19:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] xfs: don't skip the flush before shifting extents sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] xfs: flush the shifted range before changing the file Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] xfs: don't change the block map under a dirty folio Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] iomap: don't punch delalloc under a dirty EOF block Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] fs: validate atomic writes after O_APPEND and limits Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 4:54 ` Tal Zussman
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] xfs: recheck direct write alignment after write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] xfs: test for reflink after the dio " Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] xfs: refuse writes to files racing with realtime inode flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] xfs: test for always COW after the dio write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-10 19:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] xfs: refuse fallocate racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-10 20:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] xfs: restart faults " Chris Mason
2026-11-10 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110190417.32650-3-mason@kernel.org \
--to=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.