From: Joshua Crofts <crofts@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PM: add sysfs attributes for additional suspend/resume metrics
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 19:50:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110195020.7d07ae63@systembl0wer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026111023-padlock-deluge-4173@gregkh>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2026 12:29:11 -0500
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
...
> > +static ssize_t runtime_resume_count_show(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + u64 count;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> > + count = dev->power.resume_count;
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
>
> Why is a lock needed at all? The value isn't going to "smear", it will
> change right after the lock anyway.
On 64-bit systems an aligned u64 read is atomic, but on 32-bit systems it
gets split into two 32-bit loads. Without locking, the read can tear
between the upper and lower halves.
> And if you need one, why not a guard()?
Yeah, I realized this after sending the series out, nevertheless
Sashiko flagged some other stuff so I thought I'd fixup in v2.
Thanks!
--
Kind regards,
Joshua Crofts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 10:43 [PATCH 0/3] PM: runtime: add new runtime metrics and summary Joshua Crofts
2026-11-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM: runtime: add additional suspend/resume metrics Joshua Crofts
2026-11-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM: add sysfs attributes for " Joshua Crofts
2026-11-10 17:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-11-10 18:50 ` Joshua Crofts [this message]
2026-11-10 18:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-11-10 18:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-11-10 19:02 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-11-10 21:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-11-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] PM: runtime: add debugfs entry for pm_runtime_summary Joshua Crofts
2026-11-11 3:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] PM: runtime: add new runtime metrics and summary Samuel Wu
2026-11-11 9:11 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-11-11 16:56 ` Samuel Wu
2026-11-12 8:42 ` Joshua Crofts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110195020.7d07ae63@systembl0wer \
--to=crofts@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.